Parents have been warned to throw away a “dangerous” baby proofing product.
Plug protectors are in millions of homes across the UK, as parents look to protect their children from the dangers of electric shocks.
However, a report from consumer experts Which? has suggested parents should get rid of the plugs over fears they could do more harm than good.
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) and the NHS have also warned issued the warning to parents
Steve Cole, director of policy, campaigns and public affairs at RoSPA, said: "It is understandable that we want to do all we can to protect our children from the dangers of electricity and can therefore understand why people are attracted to plug socket covers.
"However, the truth is that they can be more dangerous than having a bare socket.
"That’s why we agree with Which?’s latest report, and that the safest approach to childproofing your electrical outlets is essentially to leave them untouched.”
The Electrical Safety Foundation (ESF) told The Sun: “The ESF recommends avoiding the usage of removable outlet covers.
"A study conducted by Temple University in Philadelphia, PA, USA, found that 100% of all two- to four-year-olds were able to remove one type of plastic outlet covers within 10 seconds."
The reason parents are being urged not to use the safety tool is because the design disrupts existing safety mechanisms inside standard UK plug sockets.
A typical socket already features a plastic shutter which will shut when the socket is empty, preventing a child from putting their finger in the socket.
However, the plug protectors can open these shutters, threating the safety of your child.
The protectors can also do damage to the existing shutters if they are inserted incorrectly or upside down, causing further problems in the future.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel