Viewers of ITV's Britain's Got Talent (BGT) have all shared the same complaints just moments into the latest episode.
The latest round of auditions saw comedians, K-Pop groups, singers, dancers, and some stunt acts take to the stage.
Despite impressing the judges and the audience, many viewers at home did not seem impressed by the latest round of acts.
As moments into the show, many took to X, formerly known as Twitter, to all share the same complaint.
It's almost SHOWTIME! ⏳
— BGT (@BGT) May 18, 2024
A brand new episode of #BGT is kicking off TONIGHT at 7:30pm on @ITV 1, @ITVX and @WeAreSTV. pic.twitter.com/pJ4b7p1QvP
BGT share same complaint moments into ITV show
Some viewers were not happy that some of the show's acts were not British, including an Italian ventriloquist and a boy band from South Korea.
One viewer said: "3 acts so far and 66% foreign. What f**n s**t this programme is #bgt."
Another added: "They just raid every other GT show around the world for "auditions" and fill in the gaps with the seaside sideshow acts from the UK."
One more viewer said: "Just like that the first act on #BGT is not ******* British. Turing it off."
However, not everyone felt the same, as one BGT viewer said: "Oooh, I bet the, “The world’s got talent “ mob are spinning now!!"
RECOMMENDED READING
Britain's Got Talent: full list of winners from ITV show
What does the winner of BGT get?
Through the years there have been 16 winners of BGT, from comedian Viggo Ven to dog act Ashleigh and Pudsey and dance group Diversity.
This year the winner of BGT will take home a prize of £250,000 and they are given the chance to perform at the Royal Variety Performance in front of the royal family.
In the ITV show's first three years, winners won a prize of £100,000 while the biggest winners were Ashleigh and Pudsey with a prize pot of £500,000 in 2012.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article