BBC Radio 1 presenter Greg James has issued an apology following a backlash over negative representations of disability in a promotional video for a new version of Roald Dahl's book The Twits.
In the now-removed video, Greg and Chris Smith reportedly discuss how to make the characters more revolting before James tells the illustrator to give a character a glass eye to make her “more disgusting”.
After it was posted online, the chief executive of national disability charity Sense, Richard Kramer, said it was wrong for a video to be promoting a “negative representation of disability”.
Mr Kramer commented: “The video advertisement for The Twits Next Door, promoted on social media today, is totally unacceptable and has rightly been removed by Puffin Books.
Hello! Regarding our new Twits story announcement video from this morning:
— Greg James (@gregjames) April 5, 2024
We are so sorry to have caused offence with the launch video. It was absolutely not our intention. And we apologise unreservedly. It’s now gone. We understand that words matter and we pride ourselves on…
“We remain concerned however that the book, scheduled for release later in the year, will contain a character with a disability to show, in the words of the video, how ‘disgusting’ they are.
“It’s 2024 and to be promoting such a negative representation of disability is wrong. Disability is not a character flaw.
“Why would we want children to associate a glass eye, or any prosthetic, with being disgusting? What will children learn from that? How will that make disabled readers feel?”
Greg James apologises ‘unreservedly’ for ‘glass eye’ comment
In a post on social media, Greg “unreservedly” apologised and said: “Hello! Regarding our new Twits story announcement video from this morning:
“We are so sorry to have caused offence with the launch video.
When there's positive representation of disabilities in children's books, children with disabilities feel seen and heard, and their friends and classmates treat everyone the same.
— RNIB (@RNIB) April 5, 2024
There is nothing at all revolting about prosthetic eyes, we think they're brilliant (1/2) https://t.co/gx1obGkXby
“It was absolutely not our intention. And we apologise unreservedly. It’s now gone.
“We understand that words matter and we pride ourselves on championing and welcoming everyone into the magical world of children’s books.
“We would never dream of deliberately setting out to exclude anyone.
“With the glass eye comment, we were attempting to pay homage to one of the Twit’s most famous pranks involving a glass of beer in order to remind people of Dahl’s infamous terrible two.
“It’s in no way a suggestion that this forms any part of the plot of the new story nor was it our intention to suggest that it was in any way disgusting.
“It’s unfortunate that the word disgusting appears to be a direct comment on that. That’s an error on our part.
“We are devastated that it’s come across like this but completely understand why there is anger.”
Greg said it was right for the video to be called out and said they were “upset” about the mistake, but are “still incredibly proud of this book”.
Elsewhere a spokesperson for the Royal National Institute Of Blind People (RNIB) responded to say “there is nothing at all revolting about prosthetic eyes.”
Recommended reading:
- Radio 1's Big Weekend lineup for 2024 and how you can get tickets
- Why did Roman Kemp leave Capital Radio? The personal tragedy behind his decision
- New BBC Radio 2 Love Songs host revealed following Steve Wright's death
In a post to X, the RNIB said: “When there’s positive representation of disabilities in children’s books, children with disabilities feel seen and heard, and their friends and classmates treat everyone the same.
“There is nothing at all revolting about prosthetic eyes, we think they’re brilliant.”
Puffin Books and the Roald Dahl Company have been approached for comment by the PA news agency.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel