While rare, abdications are not unheard of in the UK, leaving many curious as to what would happen if King Charles relinquished the throne.
The last abdication took place on December 10, 1936, when Edward VIII decided to marry American actor and divorcee Wallis Simpson.
This move saw the position passed onto his brother George VI, the father of the late Queen Elizabeth II and grandfather of the current King.
What would happen if King Charles abdicated the throne?
If King Charles III abdicated the UK throne, it would move to the next person in the line of succession.
This would be his eldest son William, the Prince of Wales. The last time the throne was passed on was in 2022 when the late Queen died at the age of 96 at her home in Balmoral.
In the event of William becoming King, the whole line of succession would move forward, seeing William's eldest Prince George become next in line.
The Coronation of King Charles III and Queen Camilla.
— The Royal Family (@RoyalFamily) May 6, 2023
Read more about this historic day: https://t.co/JlMnFxzlD0 pic.twitter.com/2F10e57LNA
See the line of succession for the UK throne
Here is the line of succession for the UK throne:
- Prince William
- Prince George
- Princess Charlotte
- Prince Louis
- Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex
- Prince Archie
- Princess Lilibet
- Prince Andrew, Duke of York.
When was King Charles's coronation?
King Charles's coronation took place in Central London on May 6, 2023.
The day was declared a bank holiday with thousands of people turning up in the capital to mark the event.
This came after the King acceded to the throne on September 8, 2022, upon the death of his mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here