A police chief has warned XL bully owners that they should comply with officers if their dog is seized as their behaviour may influence a court’s decision to have it put down.
The chief also urged the public to report non-compliant owners who appear to be breaking the new rules surrounding the dog breed.
It is now a criminal offence to own an XL bully dog in England and Wales without an exemption certificate, meaning unregistered pets will be taken and owners possibly fined and prosecuted.
The Government's move to ban XL bullies followed a series of attacks on people.
In October last year, a woman was injured after she was attacked by her own American XL bully in Norfolk.
New rules on owning XL Bully dogs will come into force in England and Wales on Thursday. They will need to be registered, muzzled in public and sterilized to prevent breeding https://t.co/ejxnd6vhiZ pic.twitter.com/DxUhWYZkr6
— Reuters (@Reuters) January 31, 2024
A month earlier 52-year-old Ian Price, from Staffordshire, died in hospital after being attacked by two American XL bullies.
In November 2021 Jack Lis, 10, was killed by an American XL bully while at a friend’s house in South Wales.
Around 40,000 of the large bulldog-type American breed were expected to have been registered before the deadline on Wednesday afternoon, but there may be thousands without certificates.
National Police Chiefs’ Council dangerous dogs lead Mark Hobrough has urged members of the public to report any XL bully owners not following the rules so officers can assess the animals.
Seized dogs will be taken to kennels before a court decides if they should either be destroyed or deemed not a danger to public safety.
Assistant Chief Constable Hobrough told the PA news agency: “I would urge everybody to comply with the law and the legislation. If people haven’t put their dog on the database already they are committing an absolute offence.
“We are as police forces going to be enforcing the law. We didn’t create the law but we do enforce the law and we will have to execute warrants and seize dogs and take action towards such dog owners.
Recommended reading:
- Illegal XL bullies may be put down if owners are non-compliant, police head says
- Deadline passes for XL bully owners to apply for exemption to keep pets
- XL bully dog owners warned about further restrictions
“I would encourage strongly people to be compliant if that were the situation with their own dogs because one of the very tests that is made about a dog or an owner (in court) is that the dog is not aggressive, but also that the owner is fit and responsible and not aggressive also.
“So if either of those things were not complied with, then there would be no option for a court then but to destroy the dog.”
ACC Hobrough said officers, if met with resistance, will take “proportionate action with minimum use of force” to seize dogs.
The recent ban may spark higher demand for kennels and cause “logistical challenges” for officers, ACC Hobrough said, with police forces “actively looking to enhance” the numbers they can hold.
There are 137 dog legislation officers across the country, with at least one in every force
Environment Secretary Steve Barclay said: “The ban on XL bullies is now in place meaning it is illegal to own one of these dogs unless it has been registered.
“We have delivered our pledge to bring in this important measure to protect public safety, and we expect all XL bully owners to comply with the strict conditions.”
When the ban was announced the government launched a compensation scheme for owners to have their dogs put down, with more than 150 claims received.
The total number of XL bullies, estimated by animal groups, has ranged between 50,000 and 100,000, the RSPCA has said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel