Martin Lewis has written to Chancellor Jeremy Hunt asking him to take action in his upcoming budget and tackle the issue of mid-contract broadband and mobile price rises.
The Money Saving Expert warned the Chancellor that customers with BT, EE, TalkTalk, Three and Vodafone all face rises of around 8% in April.
In his letter, Mr Lewis addressed the lifetime ISA penalty hitting young first time buyers, unfair Child Benefit rules penalising single income families, and substantial real term cuts to student living loans.
He also challenged the Chancellor to tackle mid-contract price rises.
The budget is just 6 weeks away. Today I sent the Chancellor, @Jeremy_Hunt a letter, on his request, to ask that he fixes:
— Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) January 22, 2024
- Unfair Child Benefit rules penalising single income families
- The Lifetime ISA penalty hitting young 1st time buyers
- Above inflation mid-contract… pic.twitter.com/ZVIt00Cq1p
Mr Lewis said: “You have spent the past year focused on reducing inflation. Yet the policies of telecoms providers are both inflationary and anti-competitive.
“They bake into their contracts 3% or 4% above-inflation price hikes each year, which is, by definition, inflationary in its own right.
“Last April, the rise was 17% - now we’ve just learnt December’s inflation figures, which most base their rises on, meaning BT, EE, TalkTalk, Three and Vodafone have all just confirmed huge rises of around 8% for April 2024.
“Worse, this impacts those who are locked in the middle of their contracts, so cannot take advantage of the competitive market to ditch and switch.
“While Ofcom is consulting on proposals to only allow mid-contract rises laid out in pounds and pence in advance, that still allows above-inflation rises.
“Whereas best practice, if rises are to be allowed, is to have that system, but with an override saying it cannot be more than inflation.
“You kindly said you’d write to the Competition and Markets Authority about this if I presented evidence. I’ve enclosed info and date on this of mine, and additional evidence from Which?”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel