Saving for a house can be difficult and often takes time, but there are certain money-saving schemes available that can help your financial situation.
For example, some Individual Saving Accounts (ISAs) allow you to save or invest money in a tax-efficient way.
This includes Help to Buy ISAs and Lifetime ISAS, but what is the difference and should you swap from one to another?
The Money Saving Expert founder, Martin Lewis, recently offered this advice on how first-time buyers can get £1,000s free towards their home as they try to get onto the property ladder.
👚 TAX ON ONLINE SELLING? 👢
— The Martin Lewis Money Show Live (@itvMLshow) January 10, 2024
Martin helped IRON out the confusion around the new tax reporting rules for online second-hand selling last night 👕
Catch up on ITVX now -https://t.co/X3eLnbEI5X#MartinLewis pic.twitter.com/8dqbI1P6Po
What does Martin Lewis say about ISAs?
On a recent episode of The Martin Lewis Money Show, one viewer asked if they should keep putting money into their Help to Buy ISA or swap to a Lifetime ISA.
Martin said: “Help to Buy ISA is more flexible. The Lifetime ISA can give you a bigger bonus.”
As he pointed to a graphic on-screen during his ITV show, he explained: “Look, these are all about first-time buyers ISAs.
“So these are people who have never owned a home before.
“The Lifetime ISA is the one that you can open now if you’re aged 18 to 39. The Help to Buy ISA is closed to new applicants but hundreds of thousands of people have them.”
Who is Martin Lewis?
He added: “Let me focus on the Lifetime ISA first, as with the Help to Buy ISA, the state adds 25% on top of what you’ve saved – you can put in a maximum of £4,000 a year. So that means £1,000 of free money from the state each year for up to 31 years.
“The big problem with the Lifetime ISA – you get a 25% bonus on what you have saved, but if you withdraw it for any other reason than buying a ‘qualifying’ (key term home), or once you’re age 60 they take it 25% off. And those who are good at maths will know 25% on a bigger amount is more than 25% on a smaller amount.
“Which effectively means a 6.25% penalty. Put it in practical terms, you max it out, you’ve got £20,000 in it.
“After a number of years, you take it out not to buy a ‘qualifying’ house, you take out £18,750. You give the state over £1,000 of your money.
How to get £1,000s free towards your first home: Lifetime ISAs v Help to Buy ISAs (& will Chancellor lift the £450,000 property cap)
— Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) January 11, 2024
Please share with anyone under 40 who's not bought a home.
Watch back the full @itvMLshow on ITVX: https://t.co/V2Ez0svQeX pic.twitter.com/pCeVCs7vJS
“The problem, the maximum property price you can buy is £450,000. You cannot buy a house above that. That hasn’t changed since 2017, even though house prices have gone up.”
Martin said this means if you wanted to buy a bigger property, you would have to pay the penalty.
It’s important to note that once you open a Lifetime ISA, it must be open a year before you can receive the first-time buyer bonus.
He added: “So my big tip to anyone this may be worthwhile for, get £1 in.”
This is because once that’s in and you have been adding to it, you can get the bonus.
Recommended reading:
- Martin Lewis apologises for 'hideous criminals' as latest scam victim loses £250
- Martin Lewis confirms whether Premium Bonds are really ‘worth it’
When compared to the Help to Buy ISA, Martin says it “loses in every category except one” – the “withdrawal penalty.”
He commented: “If you want to take your money out of a Help to Buy ISA, there is no penalty.”
Therefore, “the answer is, if you’re definitely buying a ‘qualifying’ house and you want to max it out, the Lifetime ISA is better for you,” he concluded.
“If you’re not definitely, it’s safe to keep it in a Help to Buy ISA.”
The Martin Lewis Money Show continues on ITV1 and ITVX on January 23 from 8pm.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here