The Chase presenter Bradley Walsh ran off set in hysterics after chaser Shaun Wallace made a huge blunder on the ITV show.
Bradley introduced new contestants Armin, Sally, Karen and Ryan who were all hoping to walk away with thousands of pounds on Wednesday (November 8) night.
The last contestant to face the chaser was Ryan who was competing for no money in the head-to-head after getting all questions wrong in the cash build-up.
Bradley Walsh in hysterics after chaser Shaun Wallace makes huge question blunder
The 24-year-old was asked: "What animal was reportedly used to lay cables around Buckingham Palace for the broadcast of Charles and Diana's wedding?"
The Chase contestant had to pick from 'a mole', 'a ferret' or 'a badger' before picking the second option.
Bradley Walsh was amused by the question and answers, saying: "Can you imagine a mole taking the cables through?"
He added: "It's not that, it's seeing him come through the hole like 'Where do you want this lads? Anyone got my gloves? Right Baz, put that down... ma'am'. Do you know how big a cable is?"
Ryan argued: "They used to use ferrets to do that" before Bradley responded: "Yes, but you know what, they would've attached a string for what's called a pull-through. You can't attach - look at that! You can't attach that to a ferret, by the time the ferret's gone four feet he would be like... [gasps for breath]."
When it was revealed that the ITV chaser got the answer wrong by selecting 'mole', Bradley was left in hysterics before running off the set.
He then reminded Shaun that it could not have been a mole as they are partially sighted.
Fellow contestant Karen could be seen wiping away tears in the background as Bradley struggled to compose himself.
In the end, Shaun had the last laugh, beating Ryan and his team with just seconds to go.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel