Big Brother's Jordan has been candid with fellow housemates after sharing details of his relationship with his father.
Discussing his father, he shared that they hadn't spoken in many years and described him as a "retired heroin addict".
Chatting with Matty and Trish, they asked what Jordan meant by a "retired heroin addict", as the lawyer shared his father had passed away ten years ago.
The two fellow housemates were unsure how to take Jordan's dry sense of humour but he reassured them that it was okay and they never really shared a relationship.
Big Brother's Jordan shares details of 'tragic' relationship with his father
Many Big Brother viewers took to X, formally Twitter to show their support towards Jordan.
As one said: "Bless Jordan, he was definitely trying to steer away to not get emotional."
Another Big Brother viewer shared: "If you couldn't love Jordan anymore after that!"
One even called for Jordan to have his own show saying "Can we not get Jordan his own show!"
Me, an introvert, when I get 5 seconds of confidence on a night out ✨ #BBUK pic.twitter.com/gsMpgPajBA
— Big Brother UK (@bbuk) October 26, 2023
Who is up for eviction in week three of Big Brother?
This week, housemates Dylan, Hallie and Trish all face the public vote ahead of Friday night’s third live eviction of the series.
Trish received five nominations from Dylan, Jenkin, Kerry, Paul and Tom, making her the most nominated.
Meanwhile, Dylan gained four nominations from Kerry, Noky, Olivia and Trish.
Lastly, Hallie also received four nominations from Chanelle, Jenkin, Jordan and Tom.
However, one nominated housemate was originally not up for eviction but following a rule break, was forced to face the public vote.
Fan favourite Yinrun broke a Big Brother rule after discussing nominations, meaning her nominations for Hallie and Kerry were revoked, ultimately leading to Dylan facing the public vote alongside Hallie and Trish.
Friday night will see either Dylan, Hallie or Trish be evicted from the Big Brother house.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel