The Living Wage Foundation has announced that the Real Living Wage is set to be increased by 10% for workers who are on it, but what is the difference between that and the National Minimum Wage?
There are more than 460,000 workers on the Real Living Wage which is a voluntary rate paid by around 14,000 employers.
It was announced that this will increase to £12 an hour for those living outside of London (up from £10.90) and £13.15 for those in the capital (up from £11.95).
Whilst the Real Living Wage is a voluntary measure to meet for employers, the National Minimum Wage is a legal requirement.
What is the difference between the Real Living Wage and the National Minimum Wage?
On The Living Wage Foundation website, it says the Real Living Wage is "the only UK wage rate based on the cost of living."
"It is voluntarily paid by over 13,000 UK businesses who believe their staff deserve a wage which meets everyday needs - like the weekly shop, or a surprise trip to the dentist," they add.
A range of employers pay this rate including Nationwide, Google, LUSH, Everton FC and Chelsea FC.
In comparison, the National Minimum Wage "is the minimum pay per hour almost all workers are entitled to" according to the Government website.
The National Minimum Wage is dependent on the age of the employee, as if you are an apprentice or under the age of 18 it is currently £5.28 an hour.
This rises to £7.49 for 18-20-year-olds, £10.18 for 21-22-year-olds and £10.42 for those who are aged 23 and older.
For those who are in the 23 and over bracket, the terms change from the National Minimum Wage to the National Living Wage.
The National Living Wage is set to go up to £11 an hour in April, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel