Two children under the age of 14 have left judges "speechless" on Britain's Got Talent as the show got underway on Saturday night.
Harry, 11, and Lilliana, 13, wowed BGT judges Simon Cowell, Amanda Holden, Bruno Tonioli and Alesha Dixon with their individual auditions, both getting four yeses.
Lillana performed a "powerhouse" dance routine which brought the judges and the crowd to their feet.
Wow! Lilliana is a "powerhouse of drama!" 💖
— BGT (@BGT) May 20, 2023
She really put her heart and soul into this performance: https://t.co/B1ZP2LpezT#BGT #BGT2023 #BritainsGotTalent pic.twitter.com/m6i6Q1KVHm
Dixon said: "Technically, I haven't seen anything like that for a long, long time. I'm speechless."
While Cowell added: "If I had to score that, it would be a 10."
Young Harry "rocked out" on BGT with a golden guitar, showing off some impressive skills.
At one point he stood directly in front of the judge's table and played the guitar behind his back.
Social media erupted following his performance on BGT.
11-year-old schoolboy ROCKS OUT on his guitar... Behind his back! 🎸🤘
— BGT (@BGT) May 20, 2023
Watch Harry Churchill shake off his nerves: https://t.co/VbGSftR3Uo#BGT #BGT2023 #BritainsGotTalent pic.twitter.com/qKfyyX3rLg
On Twitter, one person said: "That little boy can play the guitar, he’s like a Little Rock star."
Another said: "WOW! Harry was full of confidence once he’d started. He was brilliant. Well done, Harry."
Although some were a little more sceptical about his performance.
One Twitter user said: "Yea but when he turned around he stopped playing but the guitar didn’t!"
While another added: "How much was he actually playing and how much was the backing track?"
The Royal British Legion Band, who performed in front of Queen Elizabeth II a few years ago, opened the show with a performance of Bruno Mars' Uptown Funk.
Their performance also received four yeses.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here