Lord Alan Sugar has ordered The Apprentice to “tone down” its interview round in future series, after finding this year’s episode “hard” to watch.
The BBC business reality show faced criticism this year when the contestants were reduced to tears after their gruelling grillings from Claude Littner, Mike Soutar, Linda Plant and Baroness Karren Brady, and the 75-year-old mogul admitted he agreed with the backlash.
He told The Times magazine: "I think we need to tone that down a bit. I found it hard to watch. Unfortunately, when that was recorded I wasn’t there.
"Anyway, I’m not making any excuses. When I saw it in the end I thought this is too harsh, and we’re going to tone it down now.
“I don’t think it’s entertaining. It used to be entertaining. All the previous boardroom [episode] 11s were entertaining. This one was very harsh.
“I’ve told them now. Believe me, it won’t be happening again.”
But Lord Sugar revealed Karren - who is one of the two people to advise him every week on the programme - insisted she was made to look "hard" in the edit and blamed the production company for making things seem worse than they were.
He added: "I said to Karren, ‘You are very hard.’ She said, ‘No, it was the way I was edited. I was very nice, very polite, and it was like give and take.’
"What went wrong here was the production company went bang, bang, bang — only wanted to deal with bang, bang, bang moments.”
A man hasn't won the show since 2017, when James White and Sarah Lynn were declared joint winners, and Alan believes the female contestants have proven to be more "sharp" than their male counterparts.
He said: “I don’t know. The women are focused. The women are clever. They’re sharp. The blokes weren’t. It’s as simple as that.”
And the business guru insisted he never thinks about diversity when hiring candidates.
He said: "Not really, no. I don’t care about all that. I choose the person that can get the job done best. I don’t care who they are, what they are, what they look like and where they’re from.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel