How good are Bank Holidays with the extra day off work?
Now imagine, having a four-day week, every week. Well, it may be closer to becoming a reality than you think.
The South Cambridgeshire District Council has been trialling a four-day working week for desk-based staff for three months, since the beginning of January.
It is the first-ever council trial of a four-day-week and it has been hailed as a success, with average employee performance improving.
Staff could take either Monday or Friday off, and their pay was not affected.
According to the Bennett Institute for Public Policy based at the University of Cambridge, which analysed the results, performance improved overall, with significant improvement in some areas.
As a result, an extension of the trial for a further year has been recommended to the council’s leadership, as well as a three-month trial for staff in the facilities management team and shared waste services.
The continuation of the trials will go to a vote at the next full council meeting on May 15.
Research associate at the Bennett Institute for Public Policy, Nina Jorden, said: “Performing four different types of rigorous data analysis, nine out of 16 performance measurements showed a significant improvement during the four-day week trial compared to the same period last year, and this is despite some targets being raised internally.
“Overall, we saw an improvement on average across performance measurements during the four-day week.
"It is important to emphasise that not a single KPI fell to a concerning level during the trial.”
Director of the 4 Day Week Campaign, Joe Ryle, said the trial “paves the way” for other councils to also introduce four-day weeks.
He added: “South Cambridgeshire’s historic trial has been an undeniable success and it paves the way for other councils across the country to follow their lead.
“All workers in this country deserve a four-day week and so it’s only fair that public sector workers benefit too.
“The evidence shows that a four-day week with no loss of pay improves productivity and is a win-win for both workers and employers.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel