Dogs were channelling their inner Lord Sugar on week ten of BBC's The Apprentice as candidates took on the dog food challenge.
It comes as viewers of the business show saw shared their dog's reactions on Twitter.
As one user shared a snap of her pup, saying he wasn't keen: "Cody's reaction to the dog food challenge on #TheApprentice....he's not keen on bugs"
Cody's reaction to the dog food challenge on #TheApprentice....he's not keen on bugs 😂 pic.twitter.com/SZ2zxsQf7z
— Nerissa Ella 🖤🏵 (@nerissa_st2) March 9, 2023
Whilst another who shared their dogs an unusual snack, shared that even they were confused: "My dog, who today dug up a fossilised cat poo for a snack, wondering why they are making a worm roast dinner."
One viewer joked that their dog could've done better than the candidates, saying: "Who is watching #TheApprentice I don’t think much to this dog food design. would do a better job myself! Bowie to win The Apprentice."
Who is watching #TheApprentice I don’t think much to this dog food design. would do a better job myself! Bowie to win The Apprentice #dogsoftwitter pic.twitter.com/BmJlq94T12
— Bowie remembers Ruby ❤️ (@Rubitadogita) March 9, 2023
What happened in week ten of BBC The Apprentice 2023?
This week saw the two tasked with creating a dog food brand, tasked to create a dish, packaging and an overall brand.
With Megan Hornby in charge of her team apex alongside Dani Donovan and Simba Rwambiwa and on team two, Victoria Goulbourne leading team affinity with Marnie Swindells and Rochelle Anthony.
One member from each team was tasked with creating the dish whilst the two pairs created their marketing campaign.
Dani and Simba were often butting heads as they struggled to agree on a style and vision, resulting in mixed feedback from industry experts.
Whilst Marnie and Victoria were creating their team's packaging and marketing, the pair worked well together but Victoria did feel that Marnie only wanted it to go her way.
The winning group was team affinity after they gained the most sales and received better feedback for the judges and industry experts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here