Snow has fallen in many parts of the UK in the past day, and as a result, hundreds of schools have closed this morning (Monday, December 12).
The Met Office has issued yellow weather warnings for areas impacted by snowfall, including the South East, West Midlands and the North East of England.
Whilst schools usually close after heavy snow because of the difficulties in actually getting in, there are some questions related to how cold the temperature would have to be to shut schools.
This applies to the temperature inside buildings rather than what it is outside.
📉 It's been the coldest night of the year so far with temperatures in northern Scotland dipping below minus 15 Celsius pic.twitter.com/OMHrDaH8He
— Met Office (@metoffice) December 12, 2022
Whilst the Government recommends not letting the temperature fall below 16C in work environments, is it the same for schools?
How cold does it need to be for schools to close?
According to the National Education Union: "Until October 2012, legal requirements which specified the minimum temperatures which had to be maintained in school classrooms were set out in the Education (School Premises) Regulations 1999."
READ MORE: When is it too cold to go to work?
Where there was "a normal level of physical activity associated with teaching" the minimum temperature was recommended to be 18C.
In areas where there was "a lower than normal level of activity" like sick rooms, or a higher level of activity, like gyms, then the minimum temperature was 21C and 15C respectively.
However, these regulations were replaced by the School Premises (England) Regulations 2012 and they do not specify minimum temperatures for any parts of a school.
Despite this, the NEU still recommends that a minimum temperature of 18C be kept.
Ultimately though it is up to the school itself to make the decision on whether to close if temperatures inside were unable to be maintained at that level.
The NEU added: "The NEU does not expect its members to continue to work in situations in which the legal requirements concerning the health, safety and welfare of employees and others are not being met."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here