Autumn is here and if you're a dog owner who likes to take in the orange scenes of crunchy leaves this time of year, then there's something else you'll need to look out for.
Conkers have been around for years and even though they seem pretty harmless, they're actually dangerous for dogs.
The Blue Cross has shared information that helps dog owners better understand the effect conkers can have on their four-legged friends.
Are conkers poisonous to dogs?
Yes, they are “highly poisonous” and can harm your dog if they eat them, according to The Blue Cross.
Cases are rare but in the past, dogs have been treated after eating conkers.
Not only can the nuts block a dog’s stomach, but they also contain aesculin, a chemical that is found in every part of a horse chestnut tree and that is poisonous to dogs.
Symptoms to look out for if you think your dog may have eaten a conker are:
- Vomiting
- Diarrhoea
- Restlessness with pain and discomfort
- Lethargy or tiredness
- Wobbliness and tremors
They may also collapse or go into toxic shock if left untreated.
The Blue Cross says: "It has also been reported that dogs can experience respiratory paralysis and may die."
What happens if my dog eats a conker?
If you think your dog might have spotted a conker and eaten it, you’ll need to get in touch with your vet immediately.
Dogs who are poisoned by conkers will have to be rehydrated and receive medication.
If a conker has caused a blockage, it will need to be taken out via surgery, but this is rare.
The Blue Cross advises dog owners to watch their dogs closely when conkers are close by.
Why dogs shouldn't eat chocolate
You shouldn’t encourage them to catch or play with conkers and taking a toy out on a walk with you could help distract them if they’re interested in picking up conkers.
If your dog picks up a conker, you can try to remove it from their mouth but you should only do this if you know your dog is familiar with having things taken out of their mouth and if it is safe for you to take it from them.
Visit the Blue Cross website for more advice and information.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel