The consumer champion site Which? has recommended customers try haggling and switching when their insurance policies come up for renewal, as they could end up paying more than they should.
In a survey of 14,000 Which? members they found that 51% of those with home insurance and 43% with car insurance were paying higher premiums than they had in the year prior.
The average increase among those seeing a rise was £35 for car insurance customers and £41 for home insurance customers.
Out of those customers paying more, half (50%) were renewing with their current car or home insurer.
The benefits of haggling and switching were also found by Which? in this survey, as 25% of those surveyed discussed the price with their insurer, with 48% of those people managing to reduce their premiums.
This equated to an average saving of £56 for car insurance and £54 for home insurance.
Additionally, those who switched insurers also made decent savings, at an average of £43 for car insurance and £103 for home insurance.
These findings were made despite a “loyalty penalty” ban having been introduced at the start of this year.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) put the ban in place after finding that millions of home and motor insurance customers were losing out by renewing repeatedly with their existing providers.
In January, the FCA implemented new rules which banned car and home insurers from offering different prices to equivalent new and renewing customers.
Jenny Ross, Which? Money editor said: “With household budgets under huge strain at the moment, it’s important not to renew your insurance without first checking if you could pay less.
“Our research shows it’s still the case that the price quoted by your insurer is not necessarily the best price you can get.
“Doing your research on comparison sites, haggling and switching remain effective ways of bringing down the cost of home and car insurance.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here