Anas Sarwar has backed Keir Starmer over Labour’s benefit cap u-turn, despite anger from MSPs and charities.
The Glasgow MSP warned that immediately scrapping the limit and the rape clause could “spook the markets” leading to a repeat of the catastrophe surrounding Liz Truss’s mini-budget.
He told the Scotsman: "We are not going to be able to fix everything straight away and we’re not going to be able to do everything that we want to do or need to do because of the state of that financial crisis.
"I think having that grown-up approach most people will recognise and appreciate.”
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar under pressure over Keir Starmer 'rape clause' u-turn
In an interview with the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg on Sunday, Sir Keir refused to be drawn on a number of other spending commitments but was unequivocal on the cap.
“We're not changing that,” he said.
That was despite scrapping the policy being a key vow in the party's 2019 general election manifesto and in his 2020 leadership bid.
Even just two years ago, the party’s Holyrood manifesto said they would “use the full extent of the Scottish Parliament powers as well as working with UK colleagues to abolish the two-child cap, scrap the rape clause, and make split payments.”
Mercedes Villalba, Scottish Labour’s environment spokesperson, said there was no justification for the change of heart
She told The Herald: “Scrapping it is one of those rare policies that has widespread support across the spectrum: with the public, across civil society, across the party divides.
"It costs relatively little, it tackles poverty head on, in turn improving health and education outcomes. It pays dividends to the economy. It is the right thing to do on every level by any measure.”
The North East list MSP added: "What should Anas Sarwar do? What every Labour member should do: stick to our principles and voice unequivocal support for scrapping the two-child limit at every available opportunity."
READ MORE: Keir Starmer says Labour will not scrap two child benefit cap
The two-child policy was introduced by George Osborne in his 2015 budget. It came into effect in 2017.
It means that households claiming child tax credit or universal credit are unable to claim for a third or subsequent child born after 6 April 2017.
Earlier this week, the latest statistics revealed that 1.5 million children were growing up in families impacted by the cap.
Children's charities, including Barnados and the Child Poverty Action Group, have said this "tax on siblings" is the "biggest driver of rising child poverty in the UK today."
There is an exemption for families where a child is the result of “non-consensual conception.”
The only way this can be obtained is for the child's mother to disclose their rape to the Department for Work and Pensions.
There were 2,590 households affected by this so-called "rape clause" last year.
IPPR analysis suggests that nearly 80% of families with four children or more are forecast to fall into poverty.
Following Sir Keir’s interview, Chris Birt, Associate Director for Scotland for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation tweeted: "The two-child cap is a stigmatising attack on families struggling to get by. It actively causes child poverty.
"Who is even defending it now? Hard to believe that the politics of 'hungry children are fine with us' loses against 'they’ve modestly upped spending'."
Peter Kelly, Director of Poverty Alliance, has said the two-child cap is the "worst of the welfare 'reforms' of the last 13 years" and that "any politician that claims to care about poverty, about increasing food banks use, about the well-being of kids needs to commit to scrap this terrible policy".
Aberlour Children's Charity pointed to research by the Nuffield Foundation which found that the cap had "contributed to rising child poverty."
"Any govt committed to tackling poverty and evidenced based policy making must scrap these damaging policies to help lift families out of poverty," they added.
Research by @NuffieldFound shows the 2 child limit and benefit cap have contributed to rising child poverty. Any govt committed to tackling poverty and evidenced based policy making must scrap these damaging policies to help lift families out of poverty. https://t.co/8Advmo096I https://t.co/OW5Hv5EfqF
— Aberlour Children's Charity (@AberlourCCT) July 17, 2023
READ MORE: Starmer blasted by Labour MSP over refusal to ditch 'rape clause'
In his interview with the Scotsman, Mr Sarwar said he would “continue to urge” colleagues in the UK party to “move as fast as they can to address the issue of the two child cap.”
However, he added he was “cognisant of the fact that they have to do it within the fiscal rules that are set because we cannot have a repeat of the Kwasi Kwarteng/Liz Truss budget that means if we get it wrong, and we spook the markets, it means higher interest rates, higher inflation and higher mortgage payments for people across the country."
Mr Sarwar said: “I continue to believe that it is a heinous policy that is doing damage to families across the country and that it is exacerbating poverty. I know that my colleagues in the UK party continue to believe that as well.
"But what they are being up front and straight about is we have to look at the financial circumstances that we’ll find ourselves in.
"What they have done is they’ve committed to reforming Universal Credit. They recognise this needs addressed, but what they have not yet done is set a timetable for when that can be addressed because of that economic climate. I think that is a sensible approach.”
The SNP's Alison Thewliss said the party's leadership needed to listen to the charities.
She said: "It's time Keir Starmer and his pro-Brexit Labour colleagues listen to the experts and commit to the abolition of the abhorrent two-child benefit cap.
"Charities right across the UK have rightly condemned this decision, highlighting how cruel the policy is and the impact it has on children.
"If he won't listen to his own MPs and MSPs, surely he will listen to the experts?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel