London’s historic Smithfield meat market is at risk of being closed for good at a vote in the City of London.
The City of London Corporation, which owns and operates the site, has previously planned to relocate the market and Billingsgate fish market to a new £1 billion development in Dagenham.
The corporation put the relocation plans on hold earlier this month, but is moving ahead with a private vote on Tuesday afternoon to pull out of running the sites.
Members are being recommended to approve withdrawing from the sites at the Court of Common Council meeting. It is rare for the court to vote against recommendations.
The corporation has said it plans to offer meat traders at the site a significant compensation deal.
The Times has reported that the deal could total more than £300 million.
The corporation is also expected to table a Bill in parliament to absolve it of responsibility for running the market if the vote is in favour.
A market has existed around the site for more than 800 years. The corporation was given the right to run it and other wholesale food markets in 1327.
The current market site was built in 1868, designed by architect Sir Horace Jones.
Billingsgate was also designed in Sir Horace when it was redeveloped in the 19th century.
However, the UK’s largest inland fish market was moved to its current site in Canary Wharf in 1982. The City of London Corporation runs the site and pays ground rent.
There are proposals to transform the land of the current Billingsgate site for a mixed-use housing scheme.
The City of London Corporation has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel