Rental e-bike operators could be fined as part of measures to tackle “significant safety issues” around poor parking in London.
Transport for London (TfL) published a new “enforcement policy” in response to widespread concerns about e-bikes blocking pavements.
It said it will take action over dockless e-bikes being left on its red route road network outside designated places, and on its land such as station forecourts and bus garages.
This brings e-bike regulations closer into line with those for rental e-scooters, which are already required to be parked in bays.
The new policy states: “In most cases the operators who cause or permit these vehicles to be made available for hire in London will be subject to any enforcement action rather than individual users.”
It adds that responses may include warning letters, fixed penalty notices (FPNs) to operators, prosecutions and removal of vehicles.
FPNs would be £100 each, reduced to £50 if paid within 14 days.
TfL said it will take a “proportionate and pragmatic approach” to any enforcement activity.
The transport body said it has also allocated nearly £1 million to boroughs this year to fund 7,500 new parking spaces.
This is in addition to 2,000 spaces already created by the boroughs.
On red routes, TfL plans to create at least 800 spaces by next summer, and is targeting a network of 3,000 spaces by the end of 2026.
London’s walking and cycling commissioner Dr Will Norman said: “Dockless e-bikes play an important role in encouraging more people to choose sustainable modes of transport when travelling around the capital but we know that poor e-bike parking can cause significant safety issues for some Londoners, particularly disabled and older people.
“In some instances they have become obstacles for pedestrians, particularly in busy parts of the capital.
“The Mayor’s million-pound investment into additional parking spaces, in conjunction with this scheme to ensure that vehicles are parked responsibly, will make London safer and more accessible for everyone.
“I look forward to working with councils as well as e-bike operators on these improvements.”
Kieron Williams, executive member for climate, transport and environment at London Councils, which represents local authorities in the capital, said: “Dockless e-bikes have the potential to be a major positive step forwards for London, but to work for our city they need to work for all Londoners.
“Whilst the large majority of people using the bikes do so with care and respect for their fellow residents, we are still seeing far too many blocking pavements, roads and crossings.
“London boroughs are already using enforcement powers to tackle these problems.
“We will be working closely with TfL to learn from their new approach, so we can continue to use all of the legal tools currently at our disposal to address these issues for our residents.”
A spokesperson for operator Lime said: “We are committed to working with London boroughs and TfL to ensure that e-bikes are parked safely and appropriately.
“This decision by TfL underlines the urgent need for increased parking areas across the capital.
“This includes land owned by TfL so that the space around transport hubs remains clear and safe for pedestrians, while meeting the soaring demand for rental e-bikes.
“This year we have invested £1 million in a parking infrastructure fund to create more dedicated e-bike parking, and we employ over 250 people on London’s streets who help remove or tidy bikes parked in the wrong places.”
TfL has asked the Government to consider introducing legislation to give new powers to transport authorities to help them regulate and manage e-bikes.
A Department for Transport spokesperson said: “These schemes are an important part of creating an integrated transport system and supporting active travel, but they must work for the whole community.
“Too often, e-bikes are parked haphazardly across the pavement, causing a safety hazard to the elderly and those with disabilities, which is why we’re carefully considering how to help local authorities tackle this.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here