Opening more asylum hotels will act as a “massive incentive” for small boat crossings, a Conservative MP has said.
Last week Home Office minister Dame Angela Eagle said that asylum hotel use had risen since Labour entered government, with seven new hotels being brought into use since the general election in July.
In the Commons on Monday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper reminded her shadow counterpart Chris Philp of his plan to stop the boats with “giant wave machines” as he accused her of opening more asylum hotels “instead of closing them”.
During Home Office questions, Tory MP Julia Lopez said: “In recent weeks Channel crossings have been far higher than the Home Office expected, and that is why we have seen ministers rapidly approving new asylum hotels.
“We’re told this situation is temporary, because asylum claims are apparently now being processed faster, moving people through accommodation faster too.
“What reassurances can the minister give my constituents that the faster processing of asylum claims, with no deterrent in the system, will not simply act as a massive incentive for more people to come here on small boats?”
Ms Cooper replied: “Unfortunately, before the last election the previous government cut asylum decision making by 75% in the run-up to the election, took away case workers, and that is why the backlog was soaring.
“We have now put case workers back into place so that we can start clearing the backlog, because asylum hotels are costing the taxpayer huge amounts a month.”
Earlier Mr Philp belatedly congratulated Ms Cooper on her appointment as Home Secretary, saying he knows “how difficult” her job is from his time spent as a Home Office minister in the last government.
He said: “Since the election, 19,988 people have dangerously and illegally crossed the Channel, a 23% increase on the same period last year. Why does she think the numbers have gone up so much on her watch?”
Ms Cooper replied: “I think (Mr Philp) described his time in the Home Office as his best ministerial job ever, which, given that he was the chief secretary under Liz Truss, you can perhaps wonder why.
“He was also the immigration minister who, I might remind him, told the Commons and the select committee that he would not rule out using giant wave machines as the way to stop small boat crossings.
“We inherited record high levels of small boat crossings in the first half of this year, we have taken action to fix their chaos.”
Mr Philp referenced the previous government’s Rwanda deportation scheme, saying Ms Cooper had “cancelled the Rwandan deterrent before it even started” and the Government is “opening up new hotels instead of closing them down”.
Ms Cooper said: “The highest level on record was the last six months of the last Conservative government while he was in government, and in fact, the numbers since the summer are not the highest on record that, unfortunately, was his legacy.
“And while he was the immigration minister, he increased the number of asylum hotels 500% and increased the number of people in asylum hotels by over 900%.
“So seriously, he should not try and give lectures to anybody else at all.”
Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe said “good government is transparent government” as he called on the Home Office to publish “the number of crimes committed by illegal migrants”.
Dame Angela confirmed there will be “a huge statistical drop of immigration-related national statistics coming at the end of this week.”
Elsewhere in the session, the Tories called on the Government to go further to protect firearms officers when it comes to misconduct investigations.
Shadow Home Office minister Matt Vickers told the Commons: “I know the Home Secretary understands the importance of our brave firearms officers in dealing with serious and organised crime when they pose a danger to the public.
“I welcome the measures to provide anonymity, however, will they consider going further by allowing a defence to misconduct or criminal proceedings if an officer can show they’ve followed their training and procedure?”
Ms Cooper said the Government intends to strengthen the law, adding: “The system needs to work much more speedily to support officers in very difficult, split-second decisions.
“We have currently a review under way involving Tim Godwin and Sir Adrian Fulford that is looking at many of these issues.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel