Republicans on the US House Ethics Committee voted on Wednesday against releasing a report on their long-running investigation into President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for attorney general, Matt Gaetz, the top Democrat on the panel said.
Democratic Representative Susan Wild of Pennsylvania said the ethics panel, which is evenly split between the two parties, voted at a lengthy closed-door meeting, and no Republican joined Democrats who wanted to release the report.
Mr Gaetz had launched an effort to personally secure his embattled nomination, meeting behind closed doors on Wednesday with Republican senators who have heard questions about the sexual misconduct and other allegations against him.
Earlier, one Republican senator decried the scrutiny as a “lynch mob” forming against Mr Gaetz, who if confirmed would become the nation’s top law enforcement official.
“I’m not going to legitimise the process to destroy the man because people don’t like his politics,” said Senator Lindsey Graham as he left the private senators’ meeting.
“He deserves a chance to make his argument why he should be attorney general,” Mr Graham said. “No rubber stamp, no lynch mob.”
Mr Trump himself told senators that he hoped “to get Matt across the finish line”, said Republican Senator Kevin Cramer, who was with the president-elect and others for a SpaceX rocket launch on Wednesday with billionaire Elon Musk in Texas.
Lawyers involved in a civil case brought by a Gaetz associate were notified this week that an unauthorised person accessed a file shared between lawyers that included unredacted depositions from a woman who has said Mr Gaetz had sex with her when she was 17, and a second woman who says she saw the encounter, according to lawyer Joel Leppard.
The Senate Judiciary Committee’s Democrats sent a letter on Wednesday asking FBI director Christopher Wray to provide to the panel “the complete evidentiary file”, including the forms memorialising interviews “in the closed investigation of former Congressman Matt Gaetz’s alleged sex trafficking of minors”.
Mr Gaetz has said the department’s investigation into sex trafficking allegations involving underage girls had ended with no federal charges against him.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel