Survivors of clergy sexual abuse have urged the Vatican to expand the zero-tolerance policy it approved for the US Catholic Church in 2002 to the rest of the world, arguing that children everywhere should be protected from predator priests.
The US norms say a priest will be permanently removed from church ministry based on a single act of sexual abuse that is either admitted to or established under church law.
That “one strike and you’re out” policy in the US has stood out as the toughest in the church.
It was adopted by US bishops as they scrambled to try to regain credibility following the revelations of abuse and cover-up in Boston documented by the Boston Globe’s Spotlight series.
Survivors from around the world said on Monday there is no reason why the US norms could not be applied universally.
They called for changes in the church’s in-house canon law and reasoned they could be approved since the Holy See already approved the policy for the US church.
“Despite Pope Francis’ repeated calls for zero tolerance on abuse, his words have yet to lead to any real action,” said Gemma Hickey, a transgender survivor of abuse and the president of the global survivor network Ending Clergy Abuse.
The proposal launched at a press conference was hammered out during an unusual meeting in June in Rome between survivors and some of the Catholic hierarchy’s top priestly experts on preventing abuse.
It was described by participants at the time as a “historic collaboration” between two groups that often talk past one another, given the victims’ deep distrust of the Catholic hierarchy.
The participants in that meeting included the Reverand Hans Zollner, who heads the church’s main academic think tank on safeguarding, the number two at the Vatican’s child protection advisory board Bishop Luis Manuel Ali Herrera and the Gregorian University’s canon law dean, the Reverand Ulrich Rhode as well as diplomats from the US, Australian and other embassies.
There was apparently no one from the Vatican legal office, the secretariat of state or the discipline section of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, which processes all abuse cases worldwide and largely sets policy on applying the church’s canon law — albeit in secret since its cases are never published.
As a result, it was unclear what would become of the proposed policy changes, given the US policy only came about because US bishops pushed the Vatican to approve them, driven by their outraged flocks and insurance companies.
Nicholas Cafardi, a US canon lawyer who was an original member of the US National Review Board that provided input to the 2002 US norms, said globalising that policy into universal church law “would be one of the logical next steps” for Pope Francis to take to continue the fight against abuse.
The proposal faces an uphill battle since the Vatican in recent years has repeatedly insisted on “proportionality” in its sentences for abuse, refusing to apply a one-size-fits-all approach and taking into account cultural differences in countries where abuse is not as openly discussed as it is in the West.
That has resulted in seemingly light punishments for even confirmed cases of abuse which, in the US, would have resulted in a priest being permanently removed from ministry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel