A coroner has warned that more babies could die from issues with unlicensed medicines if providers do not face stricter requirements to report problems following an inquest which concluded three infants died after receiving contaminated feed.
The babies, who were all undergoing care in hospital after being born premature, died after receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN) feed contaminated with Bacillus cereus.
Three-month-old Aviva Otte, one-month-old Oscar Barker and nine-day-old Yousef Al-Kharboush were being provided critical nutrition via TPN, and an inquest at Southwark Coroner’s Court included the Bacillus cereus contaminant in each of their causes of death.
Aviva died in January 2014 at St Thomas’ Hospital in central London and received TPN “provided and compounded” by the NHS establishment under a section 10 exemption, according to a preventing future deaths (PFD) report by senior coroner Dr Julian Morris.
The exemption under the Medicines Act 1968 allows organisations to legally produce bespoke medicines without a licence for specific patients facing niche problems.
Yousef, who also died at St Thomas’ Hospital but in June 2014, and Oscar, who died at Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge in the same month, received TPN produced by a “commercial provider” – ITH Pharma – which is a licensed provider and not subject to the section 10 exemption.
In his PFD report – sent to the Department of Health, NHS England, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and the Medicines, and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) – Dr Morris highlighted concerns about what obligations section 10 exempt entities are under to report “adverse events”.
He said: “There is no requirement for a section 10 exempt entity to report any of its findings to the MHRA or indeed to other Trusts or the industry in general if an adverse event occurs.
“The current reporting structures (for a section 10 entity) involve reporting to NHSE and the CQC but the threshold or necessity for such reporting appears unclear and, in essence, up to the Trust.
“There may be times when section 10 entities reach conclusions which would assist the wider industry and help to assist both other Trusts and commercial organisations in assessing their own risks and improving the provision of highly specific medication to a group of vulnerable patients.
“The same may also be true of commercial organisations but they have the power of the MHRA controlling and effecting recalls and actions and the wider dissemination of information.”
The senior coroner also wrote that Bacillus cereus is resistant to some cleaning methods and that “sporocides” can be required to achieve decontamination.
“This was information and a conclusion that the Trust had reached in early 2014 and therefore prior to the outbreak in May/June 2014,” Dr Morris said.
“It had not passed on those findings either within other section 10 units compounding TPN or the wider market. Subsequently, the MHRA brought in further advice for the use of sporocides in 2015.”
He said there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken in respect of the highlighted concerns.
Recipients have to respond to the report by January 8 next year.
ITH Pharma was fined £1.2 million by a crown court in 2022 after providing TPN from which 19 premature babies became infected across nine hospitals in 2014.
The company pleaded guilty to a single regulatory offence of failing to have a suitable and sufficient risk assessment, under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, and to two regulatory offences under the Medicines Act 1968 of supplying a medicinal product on May 27 2014 not of the nature or quality specified in the prescription
Of the PFD report, an ITH Pharma spokesperson said: “We welcome Senior Coroner Morris’ Prevention of Future Deaths report, which recognises the importance of sharing information and learning across this specialised industry.
“Any information that had been shared with ITH and the MHRA as a result of a previous outbreak in the NHS five months prior to the ITH incident could have been of real value in taking steps to prevent future possible incidents.
“We are proud to work with and support the NHS and importantly, patients in this vital work of specialised feeding systems.
“We offer our deepest sympathies to all the families affected by the events of 10 years ago.
“We have done everything possible to assist the Senior Coroner in ensuring these inquests examined the full picture of both outbreaks in 2014 and we hope that these findings provide the families with answers.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel