Sir Keir Starmer has again defended changes to inheritance tax for farms, insisting that most will be unaffected and that the Government just needs to “keep explaining” how it will work.
A row has erupted over the taxes for farms worth more than £1 million, exacerbated by uncertainty about the figures Chancellor Rachel Reeves based the decision on.
Treasury data shows that around three quarters of farmers will pay nothing in inheritance tax as a result of the controversial changes announced in the Budget last month.
But farmers have challenged the figures, pointing instead to data from Defra which suggests 66% of farm businesses are worth more than the £1 million threshold at which inheritance tax will now have to be paid.
The Prime Minister said during a visit to North Wales on Friday: “I know some farmers are anxious about the inheritance tax rules that we brought in two weeks ago.
“What I would say about that is, once you add the £1 million for the farm land to the £1 million that is exempt for your spouse, for most couples with a farm wanting to hand on to their children, it’s £3 million before anybody pays a penny in inheritance tax.
“And that is why the vast majority of farms are going to be totally unaffected by this. And it’s really important we get that through.”
He added: “So we just need to keep explaining how that works, because I know it’s caused some anxiety.”
The inheritance tax changes for farming businesses in the Budget limit the 100% relief for farms to only the first £1 million of combined agricultural and business property.
For anything above that, landowners will pay a 20% tax rate, rather than the standard 40% rate of inheritance tax (IHT) applied to other land and property.
On Saturday, farmers in North Wales will gather on tractors for a protest against the changes in Llandudno to coincide with the Welsh Labour Conference.
The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) is holding a mass lobby of MPs on Tuesday as part of efforts to force a Government rethink and a separate rally is taking place on the same day on Whitehall, opposite Downing Street.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here