General Motors is laying off about 1,000 workers worldwide, shedding costs as it tries to compete in a crowded global car market.
The workers, mostly white collar, were notified about the decisions early on Friday.
The company confirmed the layoffs in a statement but gave few details.
“We need to optimise for speed and excellence,” the statement said.
“This includes operating with efficiency, ensuring we have the right team structure and focusing on our top priorities.”
GM and other carmakers have been navigating an uncertain transition to electric vehicles both in the US and worldwide, trying to work out where to invest capital and how fast the switch will happen.
The company has had to develop and update gas-powered models while investing in EV battery and assembly plants as well as minerals and other parts for the next generation of electric vehicles.
Through September, US new EV sales are up 7.2% to about 936,000, according to Motorintelligence.com.
That is slower growth than the 47% increase in 2023.
But EV sales this year are likely to surpass last year’s record of 1.19 million, and the EV share of new vehicle sales this year is 7.9%, up from 7.6% last year.
GM has about 150,000 employees worldwide, with the largest group at its technical centre in the Detroit suburb of Warren, Michigan.
The company had 76,000 white-collar workers worldwide at the end of last year.
Chief financial officer Paul Jacobson said last month that GM is on track to reach its goal of cutting two billion dollars (£1.6 billion) in fixed costs by the end of this year.
Last April, about 5,000 GM white-collar workers at General Motors took the company’s buyout offers, which the carmaker said at the time was enough to avoid layoffs.
The company offered buyouts to white-collar workers with at least five years of service, and global executives who have been with the company at least two years.
At the time GM said it could not completely rule out layoffs in the future, saying that “involuntary separations are not a consideration at this point”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel