Rare remains of Roman wall paintings and the world’s first railway station are among the sites added to a list of heritage at risk, an annual update shows.
But there is better news for a market town’s historic centre, an early railway goods shed, a city cemetery and a 1930s lido, which are no longer considered at risk after work to conserve them.
Government heritage agency Historic England has published its 2024 Heritage at Risk Register, which shows that 155 sites have been added to the list over concerns about neglect and decay.
Meanwhile 124 have been removed following efforts to conserve them and give them a new lease of life.
Among the sites added to the list are Tamworth Castle in Staffordshire, a Grade I listed motte-and-bailey fortification that needs extensive repair, and Hurst Castle, a Tudor fortress by the sea in Hampshire.
Waltham Windmill in Lincolnshire, one of England’s few working six-sail mills, is on the list now because it is at risk from climate change, especially high winds and heavy rain.
Heighington and Aycliffe Railway Station in Newton Aycliffe, County Durham, which dates from 1826 and is considered to be the world’s first railway station, has been added to the list as it has become derelict.
Kings Norton Old Grammar School, Birmingham, a half timbered building formerly used as a school from the 17th century and targeted by the Suffragettes, is subject to damp and rainwater, putting it on the list.
Victorian glasshouses at Somerleyton Hall, Suffolk, thought to be by Sir Joseph Paxton, the designer of the Crystal Palace, have been added to the list due to structural risks and decay.
Also added is the Roman Painted House in Dover, Kent, the remains of an early 3rd century building unearthed in the 1970s with large masonry walls, an underfloor heating system and areas of intact painted wall panels in red, green and yellow.
It has been added to the list because the protective building covering the archaeological remains is “no longer fit for purpose”, leaving the wall paintings vulnerable, Historic England said.
The register aims to highlight heritage at risk of neglect, decay or inappropriate development across England, with 4,891 entries on the register in 2024, and support work to protect and conserve them.
Sites which have seen their fortunes turned around and been removed from the register include the Goods Shed built in 1833 in Darlington, County Durham, which is thought to be the oldest surviving building of its type, which has been repaired and redeveloped as a visitor attraction.
The 18th century Sherborne House in Newland, Dorset, has been transformed into an arts venue, and one of London’s “magnificent seven” cemeteries, Abney Park, has been restored into an urban woodland park.
Hexham’s conservation area covering the medieval streets that formed its centre of trade, which was beset by vacancies and a rundown appearance, has been taken off the at-risk list following a regeneration scheme.
And the 1930s Saltdean Lido in East Sussex, inspired by contemporary ocean liner and aircraft design, has been restored and is now home to a cafe, restaurant, gym, public library, work and exercise spaces as well as the swimming pool.
Heritage minister Sir Chris Bryant said: “The UK has an abundance of heritage sites across the country that attract tourists and provide jobs in local communities.
“Many of these are in desperate need of support.
“The Heritage at Risk Register plays a vital role in our ongoing mission to protect and preserve our rich heritage across the country.”
Duncan Wilson, chief executive of Historic England, said: “This year, we have seen partners and communities come together to help save the historic buildings and places that need it the most.
“It’s inspirational to see how we can harness the power of our heritage to benefit local people.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here