The majority of people support legislating assisted dying in England, according to a poll.
But there are certain caveats linked to the support – including the implementation of safeguards to ensure the service could not be abused, researchers found.
The “most favoured circumstance” for assisted dying would be if the service was limited to adults who have a terminal illness with an estimated six months of life left, according work led by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics (NCOB).
Researchers said that a person’s view on assisted dying is shaped by the level of confidence they have in effective safeguarding and the degree to which they have been confronted with their own or a loved one’s death.
Academics said that public opinion on the matter is the “missing piece of evidence” surrounding the controversial debate on assisted dying, as they published three separate pieces of work examining people’s views on the topic.
Two of these were surveys of 2,000 adults across England.
Researchers found that public awareness of assisted dying rose throughout the year – from 59% in February to 82% in September.
The September survey found that seven in 10 (70%) people in England support a change in the law on assisted dying, and 14% oppose a change.
The reasons people gave their support were that: “someone terminally ill or without quality of life should be allowed to end their life”; “that people should not have to suffer” and “that people should have a right to choose”.
And the reasons people gave to object a change in the law included “religious beliefs”; “the belief that assisted dying is wrong” and “the belief that life is sacred”.
Some 70% of those surveyed said that assisted dying should be available when someone has a terminal illness and is expected to die within six months.
But this fell to 64% in a scenario where someone has a terminal illness with an estimated 12 months to live.
The NCOB said that people who have been confronted with the imminence of a loved one’s death tend to express stronger support for assisted dying.
Support for the concept of assisted dying is strongest among men, those aged 55-74, white people, those with no religious beliefs and those living outside of London.
The latest survey found that 56% of the public would support assisted dying for a person who has a physical medical condition that is not terminal – but is expected to cause intolerable suffering, but more than a third (35%) do not.
The NCOB said concerns were raised that there is no agreed definition of “intolerable suffering”.
Meanwhile 57% said they would support assisted dying being possible for a child with a terminal condition – some 13 percentage points lower than recorded for adults.
Safeguarding controls are of “upmost importance” to the public, the NCOB said, with people indicating that any service must ensure someone wishing to pursue an assisted death has the capacity to make their own choice and that they have not been pressured or coerced.
Just over two-thirds (68%) of those surveyed agree that if assisted dying remains illegal in England, the act of helping someone to travel to a foreign clinic such as Dignitas should be decriminalised.
There is also support for health professionals to be able to advise on how to seek an assisted death at a foreign clinic without fear of being prosecuted, according to the NCOB report.
“These findings reveal where there is public consensus on how a legalised assisted dying service in England should operate, were it to become a reality – having effective and robust safeguarding controls that will enable a strict eligibility criteria of terminally ill adults to be applied is clearly of upmost importance to the public,” said Professor Anne Kerr, chair of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ Assisted Dying Advisory Board.
“As the political debate on assisted dying gathers pace, we hope these timely insights will help to ensure those making the decision have the robust and trustworthy evidence they need to participate in a well-informed and nuanced conversation.”
An assisted dying Bill is to be debated by MPs at the end of the month.
Only terminally ill adults with less than six months to live who have a settled wish to end their lives would be eligible under the proposed law, which is being put forward by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater.
Ms Leadbeater said that her bill has “three layers of scrutiny” in the form of sign-off by two doctors and a High Court judge.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here