Eight people have cited a major data breach by the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) as one of their reasons for leaving the service, the deputy chief constable has said.
Personal details of almost 10,000 officers and staff were inadvertently released last August in an incident that left many fearing for their safety.
It came as a spreadsheet released as part of a freedom-of-information request held hidden data with the initials, surname, rank and role of all 9,483 PSNI officers and staff.
Police later said the information had got into the hands of dissident republicans.
In the aftermath of the leak, some officers chose to relocate their homes, cut contact with family members and change daily routines.
The PSNI was fined £750,000 for an “egregious” data breach by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).
Meanwhile, thousands of officers and staff are pursing legal action against the PSNI over the breach.
Chief Constable Jon Boutcher told the Northern Ireland Policing Board on Thursday that very few organisations could or would have responded with the swift, robust measures put in place by the PSNI to devalue and recover the information.
Acting Deputy Chief Constable Chris Todd updated the board on progress towards recommendations made following the breach.
He said about 9,500 colleagues were directly impacted and that senior officers worked immediately to have the data removed from the internet and worked late into the night to offer welfare support and security to those concerned.
Over the next weeks and months, he said 4,000 colleagues asked for support, special arrangements had to be made for 75 and 90% of the workforce took up a universal offer of £500 for required security measures.
He added that the impact on the officers and staff should not be underestimated.
“We do know, as a result of interviews on exit, that there are eight people at least in the organisation who referenced the impact of the data breach at the point that they decided they would leave the organisation,” he said.
Sinn Fein MLA Gerry Kelly questioned whether the number could be higher.
Mr Todd responded: “There’s eight that have specifically said so.
“So, when anybody retires or resigns, they are invited to have an exit interview. Not everybody agrees to that or accepts that or wants that, so there might be some people who have not had exit interviews because they didn’t want to have an exit interview who haven’t had the chance to tell us precisely why, so there could be potentially others, but certainly there are eight who did have an exit interview who said that ‘part of the reason why I’ve left is because of the impact of the data breach’,” he said.
Mr Todd also outlined other actions, such as devaluing the leaked data to render it useless to those who would wish to cause harm, which included changing the service numbers.
He said there were 967 attempts to access the data tracked to 221 IP addresses which were investigated with the help of agencies such as the NCA and GCHQ as well as international agencies such as the FBI.
The ICO said it had been the most significant data breach in the history of UK policing, not only due to the data but the context of Northern Ireland and threat to officers.
It made 37 recommendations, of which Mr Todd said 18 are now completed, good progress has been made on eight, some progress has been made on ten and one has not been progressed.
Mr Todd said the one that has not been progressed is the replacement of system, which he said was down to financial constraints.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article