Donald Trump has scored a decisive victory in a deeply divided nation.
In so doing, the Republican president-elect exposed a fundamental weakness within the Democratic base and beat back concerns about his moral failings, becoming the first US president with a felony conviction.
The Republican former president won over frustrated voters with bold promises that his fiery brand of America-first economic populism and conservative culture would make their lives better.
He will be tested immediately, however, and there are reasons to believe his plans for mass deportations and huge tariffs may hurt the very people who enabled his victory.
Still, he will enter the White House on January20, 2025, from an undisputed position of strength.
With votes still being counted, he could become the first Republican in two decades to win the popular vote.
The results left Democrats facing an urgent and immediate reckoning, with no obvious leader to unite the anti-Trump coalition and no clear plan to rebuild as an emboldened Trump prepares to re-take Washington.
Here are some key takeaways from the election:
– With modest shifts, Donald Trump undermines the Democrats’ coalition
Black voters, men and women, have been the bedrock of the Democratic Party and, in recent years, Latinos and young voters have joined them.
All three groups still preferred Democrat Kamala Harris. But preliminary data from AP VoteCast, a survey of more than 115,000 voters nationwide, suggested that Mr Trump made significant gains.
Voters under 30 represent a fraction of the total electorate, but about half of them supported Ms Harris. That is compared with the roughly six in 10 who backed Joe Biden in 2020.
Slightly more than four in 10 young voters went for Mr Trump, up from about one-third in 2020.
At the same time, black and Latino voters appeared slightly less likely to support Ms Harris than they were to back Mr Biden four years ago, according to AP VoteCast.
About eight in 10 black voters backed Ms Harris, down from the roughly nine in 10 who backed Mr Biden.
More than half of Hispanic voters supported Ms Harris, but that was down slightly from the roughly six in 10 who backed Mr Biden in 2020.
Mr Trump’s support among those groups appeared to rise slightly compared with 2020. Collectively, those small gains yielded an outsize outcome.
– The Trump focus on immigration, economy and culture worked
For all of the showmanship, profanity and name-calling, Mr Trump ultimately won over voters with grand promises to improve the economy, block the flow of immigrants on the southern border and his siren call to “make America great again”.
He also appealed to religious voters in both parties by seizing on the Democrats’ support for the transgender community.
Overall, about half of Trump voters said inflation was the biggest issue factoring into their election decisions. About as many said that of the situation at the US-Mexico border, according to AP VoteCast.
He papered over the fact that the economy by many conventional metrics is robust – inflation is largely in check and wages are up – while border crossings have dropped dramatically. He talked right past the facts and through relentless repetition convinced voters.
He also sold them the promise of the largest mass deportation effort in US history, although he has not explained how such an operation would work.
And he is threatening to impose massive tariffs on key products from China and other American adversaries, which economists warn could dramatically boost prices for average Americans.
Ultimately, Mr Trump’s victory may have had as much to do with the fundamental challenges Ms Harris faced all along.
Facing deep voter frustration over the direction of the country, with Joe Biden’s approval rating dismal, she never did distance herself from her party’s sitting president.
Though Mr Trump has now been the central figure in American politics for nine years, he convinced voters he represented change.
– Donald Trump will take charge of a nation with deep fissures
Mr Trump is poised to inherit a country with deepening political and cultural fissures and a worried electorate.
When asked what most influenced their vote, about half of voters cited the future of democracy.
That was higher than the share who answered the same way about inflation, immigration or abortion policy. And it crosses over the two major parties:
About two-thirds of Harris voters and about a third of Trump voters said the future of democracy was the most important factor in their votes.
That is not surprising given the realities of the Trump era and the rhetoric of the campaign.
Mr Trump refused to acknowledge his 2020 defeat and watched his supporters ransack the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, as Congress convened to certify Democrat Joe Biden’s victory.
Mr Trump even mused two days before election day that he “shouldn’t have left” the White House, after repeatedly promising retribution to his political enemies.
Ms Harris, by the end of the campaign, joined other critics, including some of Mr Trump’s former White House staff, in describing the former president as a “fascist”. Mr Trump, meanwhile, described Ms Harris as a “fascist” and a “communist”.
– Donald Trump’s criminal baggage not an issue for many voters
Incomplete returns show that Mr Trump’s criminal convictions, additional pending indictments and any concerns over his most incendiary rhetoric simply were not a sufficient concern to keep tens of millions of Americans from voting for him.
According to AP VoteCast, slightly more than half of voters said Ms Harris has the moral character to be president, compared with about four in 10 who said that about Mr Trump. It is quite possible, as Mr Trump has said many times on the campaign trail, that his legal peril actually helped him.
As it stands, Mr Trump may never actually face sentencing in a New York business fraud case in which he was convicted of 34 felonies. For now, his sentencing is scheduled for later this month.
He has already had one federal indictment in Florida dismissed, sparing him from a trial on whether he flouted US law on protecting national security secrets.
And he has made it clear he would use his power as president to spike the federal case against him for his role in the January 6 attack on the US Capitol.
That would leave a Georgia racketeering case pending against Mr Trump and others accused of trying to subvert the 2020 election result.
– ‘Bro’ politics beats abortion concerns
It was the first presidential election after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade and ended a woman’s national right to terminate a pregnancy.
It was also the first time that a Republican presidential candidate overly courted men with a hypermasculine approach.
But the “gender gap” that resulted was not enough to sink Mr Trump.
About half of women backed Ms Harris, while about half of men went for Mr Trump, according to AP VoteCast. That appears largely consistent with the shares for Mr Biden and Mr Trump in 2020.
– Democrats face leadership crisis with urgent need to regroup
Just a few months ago, Ms Harris generated incredible excitement across the party. She raised more than a billion dollars seemingly overnight. She dominated her debate with Mr Trump. She filled arenas. And just days ago drew a massive crowd to the Ellipse and National Mall.
But in the end, it was not enough.
Meanwhile, Republicans have claimed control of the Senate, ousting veteran senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio and putting several other Democratic incumbents on the edge of defeat.
The results will give Mr Trump a significant advantage in pushing his agenda through Congress.
Their only hope is to win a House majority built mostly through key suburban districts in California and New York, but that was far from certain early on Wednesday.
And either way, the results shrink Democrats’ geographic footprint and, with Mr Brown’s loss, diminish the kind of working class voice that can counter Mr Trump’s appeal.
Mr Trump already succeeded in painting Democrats as out-of-touch culturally with middle America.
Now Democrats are left to wonder how to reconnect with parts of the country and slices of the electorate that rejected them.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel