Sir Keir Starmer’s political rivals have questioned whether a “cover-up” took place after fresh charges – including for an alleged terror offence – were laid against the suspect in the Southport attacks.
Axel Rudakubana, the teenager accused of the fatal stabbing of three girls at a dance class in Southport, has been charged with production of ricin, a deadly poison, and a terror offence, Merseyside Police said.
Both Conservative leadership candidates said the Government had questions to answer about new charges brought against the 18-year-old.
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has meanwhile urged the public not to speculate on the case in order to ensure the victims’ families get justice.
Rudakubana will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court by video link on Wednesday charged with production of ricin, and possession of information likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing to commit an act of terrorism.
He is already charged with the murders of Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, who were stabbed during a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Hart Street, Southport, on July 29, as well as the attempted murder of eight other children, instructor Leanne Lucas and businessman John Hayes, and possession of a knife.
Downing Street insisted the timing of the latest charging announcement was purely a decision by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
But Tory leadership candidate Robert Jenrick said he was concerned facts may have been withheld from the public.
He said: “Any suggestion of a cover-up will permanently damage public trust in whether we’re being told the truth about crime in our country.
“Keir Starmer must urgently explain to the country what he knew about the Southport attack and when he learned it.
“Across the board the hard reality of mass migration is being covered up. We need the truth – and we need to change.”
His Tory rival Kemi Badenoch said there were “serious questions to be asked of the police, the CPS and also of Keir Starmer’s response to the whole situation”.
Writing on X, formerly Twitter, she added: “Parliament is the right place for this to happen.
“While we must abide by the rules of contempt of court and not prejudice this case, it is important that there is appropriate scrutiny.”
Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, meanwhile claimed he had been calling on the authorities to reveal more details about the case to “stop the online speculation”.
Downing Street denied the Government had been involved in the timing of the charging announcement.
A spokeswoman said: “No, charging decisions and when those are made are for the CPS.”
She also said it was “not correct” to say the Government had been involved in withholding facts from the public.
Ms Cooper meanwhile said the additional charges “will undoubtedly be distressing for people in Southport”.
In a warning against speculating about the case, she added: “The most important thing is to get justice for Bebe, Alice and Elsie and their heartbroken families, and all those affected by the attack, and nobody should put that at risk.
“The police and prosecutors have an important job to do in their investigation, pursuing every avenue and taking the action they need to ahead of the trial.”
The latest charges came after searches of Rudakubana’s home in Banks, Lancashire, Merseyside Police Chief Constable Serena Kennedy said at a press conference on Tuesday.
The alleged terror offence relates to a PDF file entitled Military Studies In The Jihad Against The Tyrants, The Al Qaeda Training Manual.
Searches were carried out in the days after the attack, although it was not confirmed when the ricin was found.
According to the charges, authorised by the CPS on Tuesday, the toxin was produced on or before July 29, and Rudakubana was charged with possessing the document between August 29 2021 and July 30 2024.
Rudakubana is alleged to have entered the school holiday dance class at a small business park in Southport shortly before midday on July 29.
Elsie and Bebe were pronounced dead at the scene.
Alice was pronounced dead at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital in the early hours of the next day.
The day after the attack, thousands of people turned out for a peaceful vigil in the town but later a separate protest erupted into violence outside a mosque in the town.
In the following week, protests took place in dozens of towns and cities across the country and descended into violence and rioting, with asylum centre hotels in particular targeted.
More than 1,000 arrests have since been made and hundreds of people have been charged and jailed.
A provisional trial date for Rudakubana has been set for January next year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article