Rules on MPs’ expenses could be simplified to address public concern and make sure politicians understand their responsibilities when it comes to spending public funds.
The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa), the watchdog responsible for expenses, has proposed changing how and when it publishes information on MPs’ expenses, saying it would aid transparency and reduce the burden on MPs and their staff.
The changes, proposed in a consultation launched on Tuesday, include removing individual declarations for items worth under £50 such as newspapers or stationery.
As a regulator, we also have a duty to provide assurance to the public that public money is being spent in the right way, on the right things
Ipsa suggested the current system, which publishes each individual item claimed for, leads to claims that “look unusual” when “viewed in isolation” and creates a disincentive for MPs and their staff to claim at all.
Other potential changes include publishing claims for rental costs annually, capping the amount MPs can spend on communications and advertising, and allowing MPs to recognise staff members’ past service with other parliamentarians in order to protect their employment rights.
The overarching change would be a move from “mechanistic rule following” to a “principles-based” system, requiring MPs to abide by a series of general statements.
Ipsa argued the existing system could “lack sufficient focus” and “portray an unclear picture” of the risks of non-compliance.
Richard Lloyd, Ipsa’s chairman, said: “The general election in July led to the UK having its most diverse Parliament yet. Appropriate funding is crucial to supporting anyone, from all walks of life, to be an MP.
“As a regulator, we also have a duty to provide assurance to the public that public money is being spent in the right way, on the right things.
“This consultation proposes changes to the way we regulate MPs that recognises the importance of appropriate funding and flexibility to enable MPs to do their jobs, alongside the need for transparency and promoting public trust and confidence in our parliamentary democracy.”
The consultation is open until December 13.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel