Two men have appeared in court accused of assisting the Hong Kong intelligence service.
Chi Leung (Peter) Wai, 39, and Chung Biu Yuen, 64, who are also accused of foreign interference, appeared at a hearing at the Old Bailey on Friday wearing suits.
The charges against them allege that between December 20 2023 and May 2 2024, Wai and Yuen agreed to undertake information gathering, surveillance and acts of deception that were likely to materially assist a foreign intelligence service.
It is also alleged that on May 1 2024 they forced entry into a UK residential address, being reckless as to whether the prohibited conduct, or course of conduct of which it forms part, would have an interference effect.
They were not asked to enter pleas to the charges on Friday and arraignment was adjourned to November 22.
Prosecutor Duncan Atkinson KC said: “This is a case under the National Security Act. There are particular sensitivities to it.”
Wai, of Staines-upon-Thames, Surrey and Yuen, of Hackney, east London, were charged with the offences under the National Security Act following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command.
A provisional trial is set for the Old Bailey from February 10 next year.
The pair were originally charged alongside former Royal Marine, Matthew Trickett, who was an immigration enforcement officer and private investigator from Maidenhead, Berkshire.
He appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court with his co-defendants on May 13 and was granted bail. He was found dead in Grenfell Park, Maidenhead, after a report from a member of the public on May 19.
At a hearing at the Old Bailey on May 24, prosecutor Alistair Richardson said the Crown Prosecution had notified the court that the case against Trickett would be formally “discontinued” after the “unexplained” death.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article