A Metropolitan Police officer has been sacked for posting offensive tweets about Jewish people and non-Muslims.
Pc Ruby Begum was found to have committed gross misconduct after she admitted to posting discriminatory language such as “dirty Zionists. Hell is waiting” while serving as a special constable.
The 29-year-old also admitted using the term “kuffar” to refer to non-believers, using a shortened version of Pakistani, and making controversial comments about the September 11 2001 terror attacks.
Around 25,000 posts were made between 2013 and 2019 under the Twitter, now X, username @ruby_beee, the hearing was told.
Ms Begum denied gross misconduct and said her comments – which she agreed could be deemed discriminatory – amounted to simple misconduct and a final warning would be a sufficient outcome.
But the panel said they found her posts “appalling”, “derogatory” and “abusive” and told the defendant her actions amounted to gross misconduct and dismissed her without notice.
Chairwoman Evis Samupfonda said: “(The posts) are derogatory and abusive, and also show a lack of tolerance for others who do not share the same characteristics as Ms Begum.
“It falls far below the standard of professional behaviour for police officers… (The tweets) are racist, discriminatory and intolerant.”
Ms Samupfonda later described the comments as “so vile that members of the public could not be confident they would be treated fairly” and said the panel rejected the idea they were the result of “immaturity” and instead born out of “deep seated personal beliefs”.
Ms Begum gained widespread recognition in 2020 after a photo of her facing down anti-lockdown protesters in London went viral.
But in 2021, a Mail On Sunday article revealed her controversial posts on Twitter.
These included a series of derogatory posts about Jewish people, saying: “Dirty Zionists. Hell is waiting” and “Zionists have no heart”.
Ms Begum had previously told the panel she had “transformed” as a person since posting the tweets, adding: “I was silly. It was almost 10 years ago and I’ve developed a lot through the police.”
She later said: “It looks bad on paper and I can see how immature I was… I made a mistake which I’m sorry for.”
But the panel told the hearing they rejected her claims of immaturity as “she was an adult and a serving police officer”.
They also said Ms Begum underwent two rounds of equality and diversity training, once in 2014 when joining as a special constable and again in 2016 when becoming a full-time police constable.
Ms Samupfonda said: “(Pc Begum) posted inappropriate comments after undertaking repeated training in equality and diversity. The last post was in 2019.
“There is little doubt she breached the standards of professional behaviour expected for police officers.
“And her conduct continued while a serving member of the Metropolitan Police. The panel is appalled by Pc Begum’s behaviour.
“She has shown a lack of empathy for members of the public and her colleagues, and the tweets would undermine public confidence in the (Metropolitan Police)… The only appropriate outcome is dismissal without notice.”
Chief Superintendent Colin Wingrove, in charge of the Met’s Taskforce, said after the hearing: “There is absolutely no place within the Met for anyone with racist or otherwise hateful attitudes.
“Our diverse workforce, made up of people from a range of backgrounds, makes us better able to reflect and serve the public. We are working hard to build a culture where anyone can feel welcome and thrive.
“Those who undermine these goals have no place in the organisation. They are not suitable to serve Londoners and will feel the consequences.
“The overwhelming majority of officers in the Met make a fantastic contribution to policing London, but we can only rebuild trust and continue to deliver the change that is needed by taking action, as we have today, to remove those within our ranks who do not share our values.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article