A sheriff has recommended the current system of pensioners declaring they are fit and able to drive be overhauled following an inquiry into the death of a three-year-old boy.
Xander Irvine died after he was hit by a Kia Picanto car while out walking with his mother, Victoria, on Morningside Road, Edinburgh, on June 30 2020.
The car was being driven by Edith Duncan whom, a fatal accident inquiry (FAI) in the city’s sheriff court heard earlier this year, was performing a turning manoeuvre when she accelerated and struck the boy and his mother.
Xander died in the city’s Royal Hospital for Sick Children later the same day from “multiple injuries”.
Miss Duncan, 91, who was facing prosecution for the incident, died a year later.
Sheriff Nigel Ross concluded Ms Duncan, who had dementia, lost control of her car during the turning manoeuvre which caused her car to mount the pavement, striking Xander and his mother.
He said in a written FAI determination this loss of control was “entirely caused” by Miss Duncan’s “inability” to perform safely “what would otherwise have been a routine turning manoeuvre”.
He added the collision could have been avoided if Miss Duncan’s cognitive ability been properly assessed and had authorities subsequently moved to revoke her driving licence.
“Revocation was both reasonable and required in light of her cognitive impairment and consequent inability to drive safely,” he found.
“Had reasonable precautions been taken, prior to the collision, to assess Edith Duncan’s cognitive ability, these would have identified that she required further assessment of her driving ability.
“That further assessment would have, in turn, led to the conclusion that she was significantly cognitively impaired and unfit to hold a driving licence.
“The DVLA would have revoked her licence on that basis. Accordingly, had her cognitive impairment been detected, the incident would have been avoided.”
Sheriff Ross went on to describe the current system of self-certification of fitness to drive for people over 70 years of age as “significantly defective”.
He recommended an overhaul of the system including limiting self-certification to people aged under 80 and requiring anyone over 80 to undertake a cognitive assessment before a renewed licence is granted.
“The current regime of self-certification of fitness for drivers over 70 years of age is significantly defective,” he said. “It relies on self-certification by the applicant driver.
“It fails to identify unfitness to drive in applicants who either deliberately, or unintentionally, fail to give correct information on the relevant application form.
“It fails to recognise that driving ability may decline with age, or that dementia sufferers may be unaware of their own condition.
“I recommend … that the present system of self-certification of fitness to drive after the age of 70 years be changed as a matter of priority, by limiting self-certification of fitness to drive only to applications before the age of 80 years.
“Application for renewal should continue to be required every three years, from the age of 70 onwards.
“Any application for renewal by a driver aged 80 or older should not be granted unless the applicant driver has successfully undertaken a short, initial, cognitive assessment.
“Failure to pass that assessment should result in both the application for renewal, and any current licence, being suspended pending further assessment.”
Sheriff Ross also recommended further questions be added to the current application form for renewal of a driving licence to prompt information about recent driving history.
The sheriff’s recommendation to alter the self-certification of fitness to drive would require changes to primary legislation, which would be a matter for the UK Government to consider.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here