The Cabinet is united on the Government’s spending plans, Rachel Reeves has insisted amid reports of arguments over the upcoming Budget.
The Chancellor was reportedly locked in negotiations with some ministers until last week as she sought £40 billion of tax rises and spending cuts ahead of the announcement on October 30.
Speaking to the PA news agency, Ms Reeves said the final settlements had been confirmed but acknowledged it had been “right for all Cabinet members to want to get the best settlement for their departments”.
She added that settling departmental budgets was “an important achievement and shows the determination of this Government to get a grip of the public finances, and shows that we are as one, united in fixing the mess that the Conservatives left for us”.
Several ministers were reported to have written to the Prime Minister to express concern about the scale of cuts being demanded in some areas as the Chancellor attempts to find £40 billion with which to deliver Labour’s promises.
Such concerns are often raised as part of Budget negotiations between ministers and the Treasury but these come in the context of Labour’s promise that there will be no “return to austerity” and fears of further backlash similar to that seen after the winter fuel payment cut.
Ms Reeves insisted her Budget would be “honest” about the state of the public finances and what needed to be done to put them “on a firm footing” while doing “everything within our power” to protect living standards and the NHS.
The health service is one of the few departments expected to come out as a winner from the Budget process, with reports suggesting it will receive a significant real-terms increase in funding as the Government stakes its popularity on cutting waiting lists.
But Government sources said reports of an increase of between 3-4% were not accurate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel