Derry Girls creator Lisa McGee has said ITV’s advert for a head of generative AI innovation is “incredibly depressing” and “unethical”.
A job advert posted on LinkedIn last week, which is no longer accepting applications, asked for AI experts to apply to become an “innovative and visionary leader” earning between £80,000 and £95,000 per year.
The broadcaster said the successful candidate would “drive the strategy and execution of AI-driven transformation across ITV Studios and ITV’s streaming services”.
It said AI would be used for “character development and enhanced production graphics”.
But McGee, 44, told TV business news site Broadcast Now she found the post “disturbing”.
Speaking about the advertised role, she told the publication: “Incredibly depressing and considering how AI material is generated, unethical.
“I personally don’t think this model will work. Great stories are in the telling, the tone, the point of view, the personal.
“Screenwriting is both an art form and a craft and I think what I find most disturbing is this desire to replace us.”
Her thoughts were echoed by the creator of Channel 4’s Big Boys, Jack Rooke, who told Broadcast Now that ITV was “neglecting to realise their most successful scripted projects have always been born out of real life human experience”.
Rooke, 31, told the news site that hits like Mr Bates Vs The Post Office and Coronation Street were examples of shows that had “quite literally shaped, reflected and changed our society” that were “built by real life writers, creating characters we have loved for decades”.
The PA news agency understands the broadcaster’s role would not have seen AI used to come up with ideas, only to help with ideas created by humans.
An ITV spokesperson said: “At ITV we are using AI tools to enhance and expand our creative and production processes.
“While nothing can replace the human creativity of our teams, we are exploring how GenAI can help our staff to work more efficiently and creatively and optimise our content for viewers.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here