Delays to granting probate is causing charities to cut back on vital services amid a squeeze on their finances, according to new research.
A study published by wealth manager Rathbones found that over a quarter of charity bosses said they have had to cut jobs as probate delays have affected their finances.
The research showed that almost all charities, 99%, are currently affected by hold-ups in probate.
Andy Pitt, head of charities at Rathbones, said “significant delays with probate are causing charities to miss out on millions of pounds of income, which they need to be able to fund vital services and life-saving research”.
Gifts in wills currently raise around £4 billion annually for UK charities.
However, the research found that bereaved families are having to wait an average of more than 11 months for probate to be granted after a recent increase in waiting periods.
The wealth manager, which is responsible for £9.4 billion in funds under management for more than 3,000 charities, said that around 14% of each charity’s income is currently held up by probate issues.
This had led charity bosses to make difficult decisions in order meet the financial gap.
Eight in 10 senior charity executives said the problems are affecting their recruitment plans while 51% said it had caused them to cut back on their services.
The research also found that 43% said they have sold assets, such as property, to fill the gap while 27% have made redundancies.
Mr Pitt said: “The logjam is not only adding to the financial stress of grieving families, with property sales falling through or having to pay interest payments on inheritance tax – but is also resulting in many senior charity executives having to make difficult decisions on how to cope with hindered cash flow.
“They don’t know how long they could be waiting to receive these much-needed funds and it’s impossible to budget or plan for the future.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here