The prominent American journalist and historian Anne Applebaum urged continued support for Ukraine as she accepted a prestigious German prize on Sunday, saying pacifism in the face of aggression is often nothing more than appeasement.
She made her appeal to an audience in Frankfurt, where she was awarded the Peace Prize of the German Book Trade.
She was joined by her husband, Polish foreign minister Radek Sikorski, who like his wife is a strong voice on the international stage for supporting Ukraine as it defends itself against Russia’s invasion.
“If there is even a small chance that military defeat could help end this horrific cult of violence in Russia, just as military defeat once brought an end to the cult of violence in Germany, we should take it,” Ms Applebaum said.
Many Germans have embraced an ethos of pacifism as a result of their nation’s aggression under Adolf Hitler during the Second World War.
Many have misgivings now about supplying weapons to Kyiv, fearing Russia and worried that it could cause the war to spread beyond Ukraine’s borders to the rest of Europe.
“Some even call for peace by referring solemnly to the ‘lessons of German history’,” Ms Applebaum said, according to a transcript of her speech published by the prize organisation.
“As I am here today accepting a peace prize, this seems the right moment to point out that ‘I want peace’ is not always a moral argument,” she said.
“This is also the right moment to say that the lesson of German history is not that Germans should be pacifists.”
“On the contrary, we have known for nearly a century that a demand for pacifism in the face of an aggressive, advancing dictatorship can simply represent the appeasement and acceptance of that dictatorship.”
She said the “real lesson” from German history should be that Germans “have a special responsibility to stand up for freedom and to take risks in doing so”.
The prize, which is endowed with 25,000 euros (£21,000), was awarded in St Paul’s Church in Frankfurt, which is considered the birthplace of German parliamentary democracy, at the end of the Frankfurt Book Fair.
The prize has been awarded since 1950. It honours individuals who have contributed to turning the idea of peace into reality through literature, science or art.
Last year’s prize was awarded to British-Indian writer Sir Salman Rushdie for his perseverance despite enduring decades of threats and violence.
The German news agency dpa reported that Applebaum’s strong support for continuing to arm Ukraine triggered some criticism, citing Karin Schmidt-Friderichs, the head of the German Publishers and Booksellers Association, which awards the prize.
Nonetheless she received strong applause for her speech, dpa reported from Frankfurt.
Following pacifism to its logical conclusion, Applebaum argued, would “mean that we should acquiesce to the military conquest of Ukraine, to the cultural destruction of Ukraine, to the construction of concentration camps in Ukraine, to the kidnapping of children in Ukraine”.
Ms Applebaum writes for The Atlantic magazine. She has written books that focus on totalitarianism in eastern Europe, including The Gulag and The Iron Curtain and Red Famine, about dictator Joseph Stalin’s war on Ukraine.
She recently published Autocracy, Inc. The Dictators Who Want to Run the World. In 2004, she was awarded the prestigious Pulitzer Prize.
The prize jury said Ms Applebaum’s analyses of communist and post-communist systems in the Soviet Union and Russia reveal “the mechanisms by which authoritarians grab hold of power and maintain their control”.
The commendation for Applebaum was delivered by the Russian historian Irina Scherbakova, a founding member of the human rights organisation Memorial, which is now banned in Russia and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2022.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel