The shadow business secretary has said he would support giving ownership of the Post Office to its employees, following reports the proposal is being considered by officials.
Kevin Hollinrake, who served as postal minister in Rishi Sunak’s government, said the plan to mutualise the Post Office had been considered when he was in office.
Sky News reported that the Department for Business and Trade has asked BCG, the management consultancy, to review options for how to mutualise the institution – which has more than 11,600 branches across the UK.
It would see the Post Office run in a similar model to that of the John Lewis Partnership, which runs the department store and supermarket Waitrose.
No decision has been taken. A report is expected to be presented to Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, in the coming months, according to Sky News.
Speaking to Laura Kuenssberg on BBC One on Sunday, Mr Hollinrake said: “Mutualisation was always on the table when the Post Office became an independent organisation, so we should look at that.
“There is a feeling, quite understandably, amongst postmasters that the Post Office is run far too much in terms of command and control and the centre, they need more say in how the organisation is run.”
Mr Hollinrake met trade union officials and others in February to discuss the potential of mutualising it. The way the Post Office has been run has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years in the wake of the Horizon IT scandal.
It saw more than 900 subpostmasters prosecuted for stealing, based on incorrect information from an IT system known as Horizon.
Mr Hollinrake said: “We brought in an excellent new chair, Nigel Railton, who has much retail experience. He’s keen to look at (mutualisation) too.
“There are some challenges, of course, not least paying the compensation that we’ve accelerated significantly and things like the software replacement, so there would be some challenges ahead in doing that right now, but there are ways of doing that.”
He added: “But I think it’s something we should definitely consider.”
The Department for Business and Trade declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here