Two staff members at a specialist hospital unit who were filmed mistreating vulnerable patients have lost challenges against their convictions at the Court of Appeal.
Peter Bennett, 55, and Matthew Banner, 44, were found guilty of ill-treatment of patients at Whorlton Hall, a 17-bed independent unit for people with complex needs near Barnard Castle, County Durham, and sentenced in January.
The men were recorded by undercover BBC Panorama reporter Olivia Davies, who used a hidden camera to expose the poor treatment patients received behind the closed doors of the hospital unit in 2019.
Their barristers told a hearing in London in September that their actions “did not meet the test for ill-treatment”, but in a ruling on Friday, three judges dismissed their appeals.
Lord Justice Singh said: “In our judgment, the questions which this case raised on the relevant counts against these appellants were classically ones for the tribunal of fact, the jury, to decide after hearing all the evidence.”
He continued: “They were well able to decide for themselves whether what they saw and heard in the evidence as a whole constituted the offence of ill-treatment.”
Bennett was convicted of two counts of ill-treatment of a person in care, and Banner five counts of the same offence, in April 2023 following a trial at Teesside Crown Court.
Both men received a four-month prison sentence, suspended for 18 months, and ordered to complete 280 hours of unpaid work.
Their trial heard that staff at Whorlton Hall supported patients who were detained under the Mental Health Act and who required 24-hour care.
Prosecutors said there appeared to have been a “culture of inappropriate behaviour,” with claims of “minimal training,” the hall being understaffed, and “caring for patients being extremely challenging”.
The trial was told patients were distressed as they were verbally abused, mocked and wound up by some of the staff at the hospital.
During their sentencing hearing, the court heard that in video footage Bennett caused distress to one patient with a fear of balloons and spoke in French to another patient with communication problems before intimidating her.
The sentencing hearing was also told that Banner goaded the same patient with balloons and threatened to bring in male carers for her, despite knowing she preferred female staff.
David Callan, for Bennett, told the Court of Appeal that his client “may not have been professional in twanging a balloon” in front of the patient, but this was “not ill-treatment”.
He added that he did not think it was a “sensible development of the law” to turn “what might be unprofessional behaviour into a crime”.
Stephen Constantine, representing Banner, said: “It cannot surely be that every kind of unfavourable treatment, rough handling or unsympathetic dealings, can necessarily amount to ill-treatment.”
But Lord Justice Singh, sitting with Mrs Justice May and Mr Justice Griffiths, rejected their claims, stating that they “squarely raise issues of fact” to be decided by a jury and were “not for the judge or this court”.
Bennett and Banner were convicted alongside Ryan Fuller, then 27, of Barnard Castle, and John Sanderson, then 26, of Willington, who were also found guilty of ill-treatment charges.
Several other staff charged with ill-treatment offences were cleared by jurors.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article