The savings from limiting the winter fuel allowance to only the poorest pensioners are unclear and could be outdone by a rise in those seeking pension credit, a group of experts has warned.
The Social Security Advisory Committee (SSAC), which provides statutory advice to ministers on benefits, also admonished the Government for not having provided an impact assessment of its plans before they were brought into law.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the universal benefit would be limited to only the least well-off pensioners not long after Labour came into power, as part of a bid to plug what she called a £22 billion “black hole” in the public finances.
The number of pensioners in receipt of winter fuel allowance is set to fall from some 10.8 million to 1.5 million people, which could save the Government £1.5 billion.
Only those in receipt of pension credit and other means-tested benefits will still qualify for the payment, following a Commons vote in early September.
Since Ms Reeves’ announcement at the end of July, there has been an uptick in the number of people applying for pension credit, following work to raise awareness of the often under-claimed benefit.
But in a letter to the Department for Work and Pensions published on Wednesday, the SSAC said “it is not clear how the tension between the two goals of fiscal savings and increased take-up of pension credit is resolved within the plans”.
The committee also said it was disappointed no impact assessment of the plans had been made by the Government, and suggested it was not convinced by Sir Keir Starmer’s assurances that pension credit take-up would prevent a number of pensioners from falling into poverty.
It added: “Given the scale of pensioners who will be affected by this change, and the speed at which it is being introduced, we are not similarly reassured that this will be the case and are of the firm view that a more detailed assessment is urgently required, in particular, on the potential poverty impact.”
The SSAC suggested further safeguards were also needed for pensioners in receipt of other benefits, including child tax credits and disability living allowance.
Downing Street said scrapping the universal benefit was “not a decision that we wanted to take”, but pointed to the need to address ailing public finances as the reason behind the move.
A No 10 spokeswoman added: “When it comes to winter fuel our position remains that we remain focused on ensuring that those eligible for that support are receiving it.
“There continues to be effort under way in the Department (for Work and Pensions) to ensure that people are applying for that and receiving back-dated payments where eligible.”
Shadow work and pensions secretary Mel Stride said: “The Government’s own advisory body has stated that winter fuel payment legislation is not fit for purpose.
“It confirms that leaving almost 10 million pensioners out in the cold to pay for union pay rises will have a huge impact on pensioners already in poverty. Many will face the dreadful choice between heating and eating caused by this Labour Government.
“Labour have 13 days to reverse this policy before the Budget. Now is the time for them to follow their own advice, and unpick this cruel policy.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel