Water companies will have to pay a £157.6 million penalty after missing key targets on reducing pollution, leaks and supply interruptions while customer satisfaction continues to fall, Ofwat has said.
In an annual performance report on water firms, Ofwat said customer bills will be slashed in 2025-26 to reflect the penalties, with the total rebates calculated in December.
Not one company achieved the regulator’s top category of “leading”, while Anglian Water, Welsh Water and Southern Water fell into the lowest category of “lagging”. The remaining 10 were rated “average”.
Ofwat judges the performance of water companies in England and Wales each year against the “stretching” targets they set in 2019 for a five-year period until 2025.
If they fail to meet these, Ofwat restricts the amount of money they can take from customers. Ofwat said the figures are provisional until it completes a review process.
Despite water companies committing to reduce pollution incidents by 30%, there has only been a 2% reduction.
Companies are also falling further behind on key targets for pollution and internal sewer flooding, the regulator added.
David Black, chief executive of Ofwat, said: “This year’s performance report is stark evidence that money alone will not bring the sustained improvements that customers rightly expect.
“It is clear that companies need to change and that has to start with addressing issues of culture and leadership. Too often we hear that weather, third parties or external factors are blamed for shortcomings.
“Companies must implement actions now to improve performance, be more dynamic, agile and on the front foot of issues. And not wait until the Government or regulators tell them to act.
“As we look towards the next price control, the challenge for water companies is to match the investment with the changes in company culture and performance that are essential to deliver lasting change.”
Thames Water moved up a category from “lagging” to “average” as it met some performance targets on leakage and supply interruptions.
Despite this, the heavily indebted London water provider will have to pay £56.8 million, the biggest fine for the fourth straight year.
Anglian Water’s fine is £38.1 million, Yorkshire Water’s is £36 million and Southern Water’s is £31.9 million.
The penalties are separate to an ongoing Ofwat investigation into all 11 of England and Wales’s water firms, which ordered three companies to pay £168 million in fines in August, in the first results of the probe.
It comes against a backdrop of mounting public and political fury at the privatised water sector which is under fire over sewage spills, proposed bill rises and executive bonuses.
Years of under-investment by the privately-run firms combined with ageing water infrastructure, a growing population and more extreme weather caused by climate change have seen the quality of England’s rivers, lakes and oceans plummet in recent years.
Some water utilities are also creaking under high levels of debt or face criticism over dividends to shareholders and executive bonuses.
Labour has said it wants the sector to reduce spills and has even proposed sweeping new laws which could see bosses face up to two years in jail if they obstruct regulators.
Steve Reed, Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, said: “Our waterways should be a source of national pride, but years of pollution and underinvestment have left them in a perilous state.
“The public deserves better. That’s why we are placing water companies under special measures through the Water Bill, which will strengthen regulation including new powers to ban the payment of bonuses for polluting water bosses and bring criminal charges against persistent law breakers.
“We will be carrying out a full review of the water sector to shape further legislation that will fundamentally transform how our entire water system works and clean up our rivers, lakes and seas for good.”
On Monday, a report from the Environment Agency found that almost a fifth of water supplies are being lost through leaks before they reach customers’ taps.
James Wallace, CEO of campaign group River Action, said: “This might sound like a lot of money but frankly it is a drop in the ocean for polluting water companies that have handed billions in dividends and interest payments to investors.
“Clean and abundant water and healthy ecosystems are fundamental to human life and our economy.
“Yet, water companies continue to pollute the nation’s waterways without facing the full force of the law or sufficient penalties.”
Mike Keil, chief executive of the Consumer Council for Water (CCW), added: “Poor performance on pollution incidents and a failure to protect thousands of households from the misery of sewer flooding will do little to reverse the unprecedented decline in people’s satisfaction and trust in water companies, which is reflected in our research.
“Customers will rightly question why some companies should be trusted with more of their money for future investment, when they are struggling to deliver on their existing commitments.
“People need to see and experience changes which convince them the industry cares as much about the environment as they do.”
Severn Trent, SES Water, Northumbrian Water, and United Utilities beat their targets and will be allowed to charge more next year, as part of an incentive scheme.
Gary Carter, GMB national officer, called the report “damning”.
He said: “If the private sector wants to run water companies then shareholders should be investing their own money not expecting bill payers to bail them out.
“Ofwat is calling for a change in culture in the water companies, but it’s a sector which is broken.
“Water companies are not going to change themselves. The Government needs to go further and faster and fundamentally reform the whole sector.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel