A police driver feared his colleague was going to be run over just before Chris Kaba was shot by a Metropolitan Police marksman, a court has heard.
The officer, known only by the cypher AY3, described “a very dramatic scene” unfolding as he gave evidence at the Old Bailey on Monday.
Fellow armed officer Martyn Blake, 40, is on trial for the murder of Mr Kaba in Streatham, south-east London, on September 5 2022.
Mr Kaba, 24, was shot once through the windscreen of the Audi that he was driving as he tried to smash between a marked police patrol car and a parked car next to it.
AY3, the driver of an unmarked police Volvo that was behind the Audi, said he saw an officer known as NX109 go towards the driver’s door of the car.
He said he had “almost been taken under the wheels, twice actually”.
He told the jury: “So my whole perspective and focus was on that side (of the car) and the officer, because it was a very dramatic scene.”
AY3 went on: “He’s gone forward to the driver’s door, the vehicle, the Audi has driven forward, at which point it looked to me as though NX109 was going to get scooped up by the rear wheels of the Audi.”
As AY3 gave evidence and viewed dashcam footage from the Volvo and footage from his own body-worn camera of what happened, he realised that in fact two officers had gone to the driver’s door of the Audi, first NX109 and then NX137.
Patrick Gibbs KC, defending, asked him whether police officers are asked to give multiple statements after incidents, because perception is “inevitably” distorted.
AY3 replied: “Yes.”
As the Audi reversed towards the Volvo for a second time, AY3 heard a gunshot.
He told the jury he heard someone shout “Shots fired”, and then someone shout “Head shot”.
AY3 then helped give CPR to Mr Kaba before paramedics arrived.
Under questioning by Mr Gibbs, he explained that officers do not train with vehicles shunting backwards and forwards, because it is too dangerous.
They are also advised not to go in a specific area at the front of a car called “the triangle of death”.
AY3 told the court there was a risk of “extreme injury or death” had one of the officers been dragged under the Audi.
Describing how officer NX109 had initially approached the driver’s door of the car, he said: “It looked to me as if he almost had hold of the door handle and as the car had driven forward I thought he’s definitely going under, he’s definitely going under the wheels.
“There is an extreme risk of extreme injury or death if you go under the wheels.”
Moments later a second officer, NX137, also approached the car.
“I think it was worse,” AY3 told the jury. “I think his position… he actually seemed slightly closer to the vehicle, it looked more like he was going to get sucked in and taken by the front wheels.
“For me it was worse than NX109’s original position.”
The court then heard from NX109, who was sitting in the back of the Volvo on the driver’s side when Mr Kaba was hemmed in.
NX109 got out of the Volvo and tried to open the driver’s door of the Audi, before it crashed into the marked police patrol car and a Tesla parked nearby.
“I put my hand… in the handle of the driver’s door and it was at that point I hear revving and I can feel the car moving and I manage to remove my hand as the vehicle moves forward and collides with the Tesla,” he told the court.
The jury was shown the officer’s body-worn camera footage where he can he heard shouting “mind him, mind him” to his colleagues.
NX109 told the jury he could hear wheel spinning from the Audi and did not think it was going to stop.
“Having dealt with firearms incidents in the past if you see something that’s perceived a threat you say it,” he said.
NX109 said it was “an overwhelming feeling“ to see dashcam footage of what happened for the first time.
“I was being pulled by the vehicle and just managed to get my hand out,” he told the jury.
He said that a rubber knuckle on the glove he was wearing momentarily got caught in the door handle.
“I thought I was going to get pulled into the gap between the two vehicles,” he said.
He said he thought the Audi was going to manage to force its way between the marked police car and the Tesla and drive away.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article