Google has said it will stop linking to New Zealand news content and will reverse its support of local media outlets if the government passes a law forcing tech companies to pay for articles displayed on their platforms.
The vow to sever Google traffic to New Zealand news sites – made in a blog post by the search giant on Friday – echoes strategies the firm deployed as Australia and Canada prepared to enact similar laws in recent years.
It followed a surprise announcement by New Zealand’s government in July that legislators would advance a Bill forcing tech platforms to strike deals for sharing revenue generated from news content with the media outlets producing it.
The government, led by centre-right National, had opposed the law in 2023 when introduced by the previous administration.
But the loss of more than 200 newsroom jobs earlier this year – in a national media industry that totalled 1,600 reporters at the 2018 census and is likely to have shrunk since – prompted the current government to reconsider forcing tech companies to pay publishers for displaying content.
The law aims to staunch the flow offshore of advertising revenue derived from New Zealand news products.
Google New Zealand country director Caroline Rainsford wrote on Friday that the firm would change its involvement in the country’s media landscape if it passed.
“Specifically, we’d be forced to stop linking to news content on Google Search, Google News, or Discover surfaces in New Zealand and discontinue our current commercial agreements and ecosystem support with New Zealand news publishers,” she wrote.
Google’s licensing programme in New Zealand contributed “millions of dollars per year to almost 50 local publications”, she added.
The News Publishers’ Association, a New Zealand sector group, said in a written statement on Friday that Google’s pledge amounted to “threats” and reflected “the kind of pressure that it has been applying” to the government and news outlets, public affairs director Andrew Holden said.
The government “should be able to make laws to strengthen democracy in this country without being subjected to this kind of corporate bullying”, he said.
Australia was the first country to attempt to force tech firms – including Google and Meta – to the bargaining table with news outlets through a law passed in 2021.
At first, the tech giants imposed news blackouts for Australians on their platforms, but both eventually somewhat relented, striking deals reportedly worth 200 million Australian dollars (£104 million) a year, paid to Australian outlets for use of their content.
But Belinda Barnet, a media expert at Swinburne University in Melbourne, said Meta has refused to renew its contracts with Australian news media while Google is renegotiating its initial agreements.
As Canada prepared to pass similar digital news bargaining laws in 2023, Google and Meta again vowed to cease their support for the country’s media.
Last November, however, Google promised to contribute 100 million Canadian dollars (£56 million) – indexed to inflation – in financial support annually for news businesses across the country.
Colin Peacock, an analyst who hosts the Mediawatch programme on RNZ, New Zealand’s public radio broadcaster, said Google “doesn’t want headlines around the world that say another country has pushed back” by enacting such a law.
While Google pointed on Friday to its support of local outlets, Mr Peacock said one of its funding recipients – the publisher of a small newspaper – had told a parliamentary committee this year that the amount he received was “a pittance” and not enough to hire a single graduate reporter.
Minister for media and communications Paul Goldsmith told The Associated Press in a written statement on Friday that he was still consulting on the next version of the Bill.
“My officials and I have met with Google on a number of occasions to discuss their concerns, and will continue to do so,” he said.
Mr Goldsmith said in July that he planned to pass the law by the end of the year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here