Sellafield Ltd has been fined more than £330,000 for failings in cybersecurity.
The firm, which operates the nuclear site in Cumbria, was charged after an investigation by the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) found it failed to meet standards for protecting sensitive nuclear information, making its systems vulnerable to unauthorised access and loss of data.
The ONR did not find that any vulnerabilities had been exploited as a result of the failings.
On Wednesday at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring fined the company £332,500 and ordered it pay prosecution costs of £53,253, after it pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing to three counts of failing to comply with its approved security plan, a spokesman for the ONR said.
Paul Fyfe, the ONR’s senior director of regulation, said: “It has been accepted the company’s ability to comply with certain obligations under the Nuclear Industries Security Regulations 2003 during a period of four years was poor.
“Failings were known about for a considerable length of time but despite our interventions and guidance, Sellafield failed to respond effectively, which left it vulnerable to security breaches and its systems being compromised.
“Nevertheless, with new leadership and additional resources in place at Sellafield Ltd, we have seen positive improvements during the last year, and evidence the senior leadership is now giving cybersecurity the level of attention and focus it requires.
“We will continue to apply robust regulatory scrutiny where necessary to ensure all risks, including cybersecurity, are effectively managed by the nuclear industry.”
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: “We take the safety of our nationally significant infrastructure very seriously and I welcome the fact we have a robust regulator holding our nuclear industry to account.
“I have written to the CEO of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority seeking assurance that cybersecurity failings at Sellafield are being addressed and cannot happen again.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article