Terrorist Abdalraouf Abdallah, the childhood friend of Manchester Arena attacker Salman Abedi, has lost a bid to be freed from jail.
The 31-year-old faced a parole review after being recalled to prison for breaching licence conditions in January 2021.
But, despite the decision, he is still due to walk free from prison later this year when his sentence expires.
The Islamic extremist played an “important role” in Abedi’s radicalisation, according to a report from the inquiry into the attack.
Abedi visited him in prison and experts believe he groomed the bomber but Abdallah has denied any involvement in the 2017 atrocity.
In a statement on Monday, the Parole Board said: “Following four oral hearing days and a dossier of evidence of over 1,800 pages, we can confirm that a panel of the Parole Board refused the release of Abdalraouf Abdallah.
“Parole Board decisions are solely focused on what risk a prisoner could represent to the public if released and whether that risk is manageable in the community. The panel of the Parole Board were not satisfied that he no longer posed a risk to the public, and accordingly did not direct his release.
“Due to the nature of his extended determinate sentence, law determines that he will be automatically released when his sentence expires. The sentence expiry date in November is determined by the period of punishment set by the sentencing judge.”
Abdallah was handed an extended sentence of nine-and-a-half years, including a five-and-a-half year prison term, in 2016 after he was found guilty of preparing and funding acts of terrorism by helping four others travel to Syria and was released from prison in 2020.
He had previously been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder after becoming paraplegic when injured in fighting in Libya in 2011 during the country’s uprising.
His case was considered by the Parole Board over four days on April 8 and 9, July 1 and 31 2024. The hearing days on April 8 and 9 were conducted at the prison where Abdallah is held, while the latter dates were held remotely by via videolink.
According to a report from the board, the parole review panel accepted the finding of the Manchester Arena Public Inquiry that the defendant “had played a significant role in radicalising the Manchester Arena bomber, although there was no evidence that he was involved in the attack itself or had any pre-knowledge of it”.
The report also said Abdallah had undertaken an accredited programme intended to address the motivations behind his offending “and the beliefs which enable it”.
He also undertook a one-to-one rehabilitative support programme intended to “manage the risk of individuals who have been involved in extremist or terrorism-related activity”.
Despite this, his community-based probation officer, prison-based officer and prison-instructed psychologist did not support his release, with assessments determining he posed a “high risk of serious harm to the public”.
Prison psychologists concluded that Abdallah continued to show levels of engagement with extremism and intent to commit terrorist-related offending.
A release plan presented to the panel was also deemed “not robust enough” to manage him in the community as he “retained a propensity to radicalise others” and there was insufficient evidence to suggest there had been any change in his extremist mindset.
The panel concluded that Abdallah retained an extremist mindset and continued to pose a risk of radicalising others, including those “in any accommodation he is released to or any other person with whom he may come in contact”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel