Vodafone and Three UK have pledged to cap their lowest-cost mobile plans at £10 for two years, as the companies hope to convince the UK’s competition watchdog to approve their £15 billion merger.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has been investigating the mega-deal since it was announced last summer, and could choose to block it if it thinks customers will be left worse off.
The mobile network giants said they do not agree with the CMA, which provisionally found that the planned tie-up could lead to higher bills for tens of millions of customers.
Nevertheless, Vodafone and Three set out new commitments as part of efforts to address the regulator’s concerns.
This included a promise to maintain tariffs at £10 a month, or less, for two years from the completion of the merger, for “value-focused” customers on Smarty deals.
Smarty, which is owned by Three UK and uses the same network, currently offers plans for as little as £5 a month.
The cap would also apply to the Smarty and Voxi For Now social tariffs, which are available for people receiving government benefits. Voxi is Vodafone’s mobile network brand.
The firms said they will also encourage so-called virtual providers to access their network, so smaller operators can offer good deals for customers.
Furthermore, Vodafone and Three reiterated their commitment to invest £11 billion in the UK’s infrastructure, adding that they are “happy for Ofcom to monitor and enforce” the plans.
The CMA had voiced concerns that the investment pledges were “overstated” and may not come to fruition.
Meanwhile, Vodafone also announced that it will be pushing ahead with the tie-up without asking for approval from shareholders.
Changes to UK listing rules, which came into force this year, mean listed companies no longer need shareholder approval for significant transactions such as acquisitions.
The merger would create the UK’s largest mobile phone network with some 27 million customers.
The CMA’s final decision on the deal is due on December 7.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here