Mohamed Al Fayed is alleged to be a serial sexual predator.
His sexual abuse, which has been under the spotlight for years, was not confined to his time as chairman of the luxury department store Harrods, according to lawyers for women who claim he assaulted them.
The late Mr Al Fayed was first accused of sexual abuse in the late 1980s, but the allegations did not lead to criminal charges.
On Friday, lawyer Bruce Drummond, who is representing some of the businessman’s alleged victims, said: “Reports of Al Fayed’s behaviour were made public as early as 1995.
“ITV aired a programme in 1997 covering matters. Publicists like Max Clifford thought it was funny and joked about it publicly.”
Here is a timeline of the allegations:
– 1995
Vanity Fair published an article aimed at exposing Mr Al Fayed’s behaviour.
He responded to it with a libel lawsuit, though he later agreed to drop the case as long as all the evidence the magazine had gathered in preparation for a trial was locked away.
A settlement was negotiated by a senior Harrods executive, the BBC reported.
– 1997
Four women on ITV’s The Big Story – in a programme entitled “Sex, Lies and Audiotape” – alleged that they were repeatedly groped, subjected to crude remarks and promised rewards in return for sex.
Mr Al Fayed reacted angrily to the allegations and issued a statement condemning the claims as outrageous and untrue, arguing that they were a repetition of allegations previously made in Vanity Fair magazine by disgruntled former employees.
Robert Loftus, a former Harrods security chief who claimed that Mr Al Fayed secretly but legally bugged employees, also appeared on the programme and alleged that the store owner did not care what he said to female staff.
In his statement, Mr Al Fayed said he was unable to comment in detail or contribute to the programme because he was not allowed to hear the allegations in advance and he questioned the motivation of the contributors to the programme.
– 2009
The Crown Prosecution Service, then led by Sir Keir Starmer, elected not to prosecute Mr Al Fayed following claims he had sexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl in Harrods.
He denied all allegations against him and attended a voluntary police interview.
– 2015
The Crown Prosecution Service again elect not to prosecute Mr Al Fayed after reviewing a file of evidence presented by the police because there was not “a realistic prospect of conviction”.
– 2018
The Crown Prosecution Service provides early investigative advice to the Metropolitan Police following allegations made against Mr Al Fayed.
However, a full file of evidence was never received by the Crown Prosecution Service in this instance – or for allegations made in 2021 and 2023 – and each of these cases is given no further action by police.
– July 2023
Harrods began settling claims with women who came forward with claims of sexual abuse at the hands of Mr Al Fayed.
– August 2023
Mohamed Al Fayed died on August 30 in London. He was aged 94.
– September 2024
A BBC special investigation revealed that more than 20 women alleged they had been sexual assaulted by Mr Al Fayed.
Five women alleged they had been raped by Mr Al Fayed, the broadcaster reported.
At a press conference on September 20, lawyer Gloria Allred said the “ugly truth” is that under Mr Al Fayed’s chairmanship, Harrods was “a toxic, unsafe and abusive environment”.
She added: “The allegations against Mohamed Al Fayed include serial rape, attempted rape, sexual battery and sexual abuse of minors.
“The allegations involve cover-ups, threats and a quarter century of sexual abuse by Mohamed Al Fayed after he purchased Harrods and became its chairman.”
Harrods’ current owners release a statement, in which they say they are “utterly appalled” by the allegations of abuse perpetrated by the late billionaire.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article