Secondary school pupils and students who started university during the Covid-19 pandemic have been “consigned to the scrapheap”, the employment minister has warned.
Alison McGovern vowed to set up a youth guarantee, a Labour general election manifesto pledge which she claimed would “transform the lives of young people”, speaking at the launch of a think tank report on employment support.
According to the Department for Work and Pensions, the number of young people out of work due to long-term sickness is up 29% since the pandemic, to around 237,000 from approximately 184,000 before the pandemic.
Around 600,000 16 to 24-year-olds are unemployed, 63,000 more than there were before Covid-19 spread throughout the UK in 2020.
An Institute for Employment Studies (IES) and Abrdn Financial Fairness Trust probe has recommended ministers set up a new national digital employment service, in addition to high-street employment, skills and careers centres, and an “on-the-doorstep integration of employment and careers advice within wider public, community and voluntary services”.
Researchers have also suggested new labour market partnerships to draft work, health and skills plans within communities, and an end to the 35-hour rule which demands some benefits claimants complete up to 35 hours of work-related activity per week.
“The lockdown generation has been failed, consigned to the scrapheap, because they have been denied the support and opportunities to find work, get into work, and get on at work,” Ms McGovern said on Wednesday.
“It’s truly shocking that we have businesses crying out for staff at the same time there are queues round the block for foodbanks – a dire situation that we’re determined to put right.
“The obsession with benefits management must end if we’re to bring about the change the country is crying out for, and that’s why we have a plan to get Britain working again.
“We’re going to set up a youth guarantee to transform the lives of young people by providing work, apprenticeships and skills training to everyone who needs it.
“That is how we will deliver on our mission for growth across the country and ensure future generations are never abandoned by their government again.”
IES researchers argued in their report “Working for the Future” that “the 35-hour requirement is driving much of what is wrong with our current approach: forcing people to constantly justify their actions, tying advisers up in checking what people did last week, and pushing people who are unable to spend 35 hours a week looking for work to apply for other benefits where they would face fewer requirements but also end up further from support”.
They added: “It is a bad policy, with no evidence to justify it, and its abolition would be wholly positive.”
Labour pledged a “youth guarantee of access to training, an apprenticeship or support to find work for all 18 to 21-year-olds” before July’s vote.
On young people, IES researchers wrote: “The current approach is not fit for purpose – characterised by multiple different accountabilities, funding streams and services; often competing priorities; short-term reform and stop-start initiatives particularly around youth engagement and vocational training; cuts to youth services; and many unemployed young people ineligible for (or unwilling to claim) social security benefits.
“This has also happened against a backdrop of rising ill health for young people, particularly mental health, and now rising numbers of young people outside full-time education and the labour force.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel